Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 16]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Shri Pankaj Nayan vs Union Of India on 26 March, 2010

      

  

  

 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH

O.A. NO.1020 of 2010

NEW DELHI, THIS THE 26th DAY OF MARCH, 2010

HONBLE Shri Shailendra Pandey, MEMBER (A)
HONBLE DR. DHARAM PAUL SHARMA, MEMBER (J)

1.	Shri Pankaj Nayan,
	Aged 32 years,
	S/o Late Shri S.S. Prasad,
	R/o GF-3/C 349, Garden Shalimar, Ext.-II, Sahibabad,
	Ghaziabad, U.P.

2.	Shri Devender Kumar Singh,
	aged 41 years,
	S/o Shri Mohinder Singh,
	R/o D-72, Ground Floor,
	South City-II,
	Gurgaon-18.					  ..APPLICANTS

(BY ADVOCATE : Shri Rajeev Kumar for Shri S.K. Pathak)

VERSUS
1.	Union of India,
	Through Secretary,
	Ministry of Finance,
	Department of Revenue,
	Central Board of Excise & Customs,
	North Block, New Delhi.

2.	The Chairman,
	Central Board of Excise & Customs,
	Department of Revenue,
	Ministry of Finance,
North Block, New Delhi.

3.	The Chief Commissioner,
	Central Excise (DZ)
	C.R. Building, I.P. Estate,
	New Delhi-110002.			      .RESPONDENTS.

ORDER (ORAL)

SHRI Shailendra Pandey, MEMBER (A) :

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Original Application with liberty to file better Application in which he shows some infringement of his right.

2. OA is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a better OA, if so advised.

(Dr. Dharam Paul Sharma)	      (Shailendra Pandey)
    Member (J)				                Member (A)


/ravi/