Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

(Sudarsan Patra & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Ors.) on 21 November, 2022

Author: Suvra Ghosh

Bench: Suvra Ghosh

28
jdt.




       21.11.2022
          jb.


                                  W.P.A. 21524 of 2022
                    (Sudarsan Patra & Anr. vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.)


                       Mr. S. P. Pahari
                       Mr. A. Pradhan
                       Mr. T. K. Mahapatra
                                        .... For the Petitioners
                       Mr. S. Banerjee
                       Mr. A. K. Nag
                                   .... For the State


                           Affidavit of service filed by the petitioners is

                    taken on record.

                          Heard learned counsels for the parties.

                          It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that

                    the petitioners purchased a plot of land in the year

                    1990 by virtue of registered deed of conveyance, but the

                    concerned authority refused to hand over the registered

                    deed to the petitioners due to some criminal litigation

                    pending with regard to the said deed. The petitioners

                    subsequently learnt that the stamp papers used in the

                    said deed were forged. The petitioners seek to deposit

                    the sum equivalent to the alleged forged stamp paper

                    used in the lease deed before the 2nd respondent within

a month from date and pray for direction upon the 2nd respondent to hand over the deed in their favour. 2 It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that the deed in question is the subject matter of a criminal case and is in the custody of the investigating agency. Learned counsel submits that upon petitioners' depositing the sum equivalent to the allegedly forged stamp papers used in the deed, the respondent have no objection in handing over certified copy of the said deed to the petitioners without prejudice to the merits of the criminal case which is pending.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to hand over certified copy of the deed in question to the petitioners upon petitioners' depositing the sum equivalent to the allegedly forged stamp papers used in the deed. The petitioners are directed to deposit the said amount before the 2nd respondent within one month from date and the 2nd respondent is directed to hand over certified copy of the deed to the petitioners within a month thereof.

Upon receipt of such amount from the petitioners the 2nd respondent shall deposit the said amount in an auto renewing fixed deposit account with any nationalised bank.

With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

3

Since no affidavit has been invited, allegations contained in the writ petition shall be deemed not to have been admitted.

Urgent certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)