Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Karthick vs The Superintendent Of Police on 24 September, 2019

Author: M.S.Ramesh

Bench: M.S.Ramesh

                                                                                    Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 24.09.2019

                                                         CORAM:

                                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

                                               Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019

                      Karthick                                                  ..      Petitioner

                                                                 Vs.
                      1. The Superintendent of Police,
                      Office of the Superintendent of Police,
                      Nagappattinam District.

                      2. The Inspector of Police,
                      Aanaikaran Chathiram Police Station,
                      Nagappattinam District.                                  ..       Respondents



                      PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to
                      direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner.


                                   For Petitioner               :      M/s.Greetha Senthilkumar

                                   For Respondents           :         Mr.C.Iyyapparaj
                                                                       Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                          ORDER

It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police have been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, 1/6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019 has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

2.An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfettered powers of the Investigation Officers so long as the power to investigate/enquire into these offences are legitimately exercised within the frame work of Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Though the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the Magistrate to be a guardian in all the stages of the police investigation, there is no power envisaging him to interfere with the actual investigation or the mode of investigation.

It is in this background that numerous petitions complaining of harassment are being reported and filed before this Court seeking for directions to refrain the police officials from harassing the persons named in a complaint.

3.This Court, exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code normally would not interfere with the investigation conducted by a police officer. Nevertheless, it would also not turn a blind eye to instances of harassment by the police under the guise of investigation is brought to its notice.

2/6

http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019

4. It is seen that in some cases, the investigation pending before the Police has been stayed by Court orders. It is needless to point out that in cases of this nature, the respondent Police will not be entitled to even proceed with the investigation and therefore, the petitioner may not have an apprehension of harassment in the hands of the Police.

5.In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seeks for this Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be the same to the police officer.

6.In order to circumvent such situations, the following guidelines are issued:

a)While summoning any persons named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such persons through a written summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019 enquiry/investigation.
b)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station.
c)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation.
d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to.

7. With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed.

24.09.2019 Index:Yes/No Internet : Yes/No jas/msv 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019 To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Nagappattinam District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Aanaikaran Chathiram Police Station, Nagappattinam District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

5/6

http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019 M.S.RAMESH.J, jas/msv Crl.O.P.No.25637 of 2019 24.09.2019 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in