Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Muniyellamma W/O Parasuramappa vs Venkatesh on 28 November, 2012

Author: Jawad Rahim

Bench: Jawad Rahim

                           1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

  DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012

                       BEFORE

      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM

          REGULAR FIRST APPEAL.1974/2011

BETWEEN

  1. SMT MUNIYELLAMMA
     W/O PARASURAMAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

  2. SRI KRISHNAPPA
     S/O LATE PARASURAMAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

BOTH ARE R/A. JAKKASANDRA
VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560 034

BY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER:

K. RAMESH
S/O.P. KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
R/A.NO.21, III MAIN
1ST CROSS, NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE
KORAMANGALA I BLOCK
JAKKASANDRA
BANGALORE-560 034

  3. JAYAMMA
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
     W/O KODANDA
     R/A. NO.50/5, BAZAR STREET
                            2




      1ST CROSS, HONARPET
      VIVEK NAGAR, BANGALORE              ...APPELLANTS

  (BY SRI. T K RAJAGOPALA, ADV.)

AND

  1. VENKATESH
     AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
     S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, R/A. NO.22
     III MAIN, 1ST CROSS, NEAR YELLAMMA
     TEMPLE, KORAMANGALA I BLOCK
     JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE

  2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA
     AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
     D/O LATE ABBAIYAPPA
     R/A NO. 24, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN
     JANTHA COLONY, NEAR ANGANAVADI
     JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE

  3. SRI KRISHNA
     AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
     S/O LATE ABBAIAYAPPA
     R/A NO. 24, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN
     JANTHA COLONY, NEAR ANGANAVADI
     JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE

  4. MUNNA S
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
     S/O LATE ABBAIAYAPPA
     R/A NO. 24, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN
     JANTHA COLONY, NEAR ANGANAVADI
     JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE

  5. LAKSHMAMMA
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
     W/O LATE JAYARAM
     R/A NO. 24, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN
     JANTHA COLONY, NEAR ANGANAVADI
     JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE
                           3




6. SMT.NETHRA
   AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
   D/O LATE JAYARAM
   R/A NO. 24, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN
   JANTHA COLONY, NEAR ANGANAVADI
   JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE

7. RAMESH
   AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS
   S/O LATE JAYARAM
   R/A NO. 24, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN
   JANTHA COLONY, NEAR ANGANAVADI
   JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE

8. NALINI
   AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
   D/O RANGAPPA,
   R/A: NO.22, III MAIN, 1ST CROSS
   NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE, KORAMANGALA
   1 BLOCK, JAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE

9. SRI SRINIVAS
   AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
   S/O VENKATASWAMY
   R/A NO.10, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN
   NEXT TO KUMAR DENTAL CLINIC
   ASHWATH NAGAR, MARATHAHALLI
   BANGALORE

10.SMT NAGAMMA
   AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
   D/O VENKATASWAMY
   R/A NO.10, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN
   NEXT TO KUMAR DENTAL CLINIC
   ASHWATH NAGAR, MARATHAHALLI
   BANGALORE

11.VIJAYAKUMAR
   AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
   S/O VENKATASWAMY
   R/A: NO. 10, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN
                         4




  NEXT TO KUMAR DENTAL CLINIC ASHWATH
  NAGAR, MARATHAHALLI
  BANGALORE

12.BABU
   AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
   S/O VENKATASWAMY
   R/A: NO. 10, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN
   NEXT TO KUMAR DENTAL CLINIC ASHWATH
   NAGAR, MARATHAHALLI
   BANGALORE

13.UMA
   AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
   D/O VENKATASWAMY
   R/A: NO. 10, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN
   NEXT TO KUMAR DENTAL CLINIC ASHWATH
   NAGAR, MARATHAHALLI
   BANGALORE

14.MANJU
   AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
   S/O VENKATASWAMY
   R/A: NO. 10, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN
   NEXT TO KUMAR DENTAL CLINIC ASHWATH
   NAGAR, MARATHAHALLI
   BANGALORE

15.VASU
   AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
   S/O VENKATASWAMY
   R/A: NO. 10, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN
   NEXT TO KUMAR DENTAL CLINIC ASHWATH
   NAGAR, MARATHAHALLI
   BANGALORE

16.SMT. SHANTHAMMA
   AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
   D/O ABBAIAH
   R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
                          5




  1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
  NAGAR, BANGALORE

17.MANJAMMA
   AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
   W/O LATE PAPARAJU
   R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
   1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
   NAGAR, BANGALORE

18.KIRAN
   AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
   S/O LATE PAPARAJU
   R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
   1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
   NAGAR, BANGALORE

19.APPU
   AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
   S/O LATE PAPARAJU
   R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
   1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
   NAGAR, BANGALORE

20.SRI RAJA
   AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
   S/O LATE ABBAIAH
   R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
   1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
   NAGAR, BANGALORE

21.GOWRAMMA
   AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
   D/O LATE ABBAIAH
   R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
   1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
   NAGAR, BANGALORE

22.KODANDA
   AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
   S/O LATE ABBAIAH
                                  6




           R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
           1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
           NAGAR, BANGALORE

        23.GOVINDA
           AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
           S/O LATE ABBAIAH
           R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
           1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
           NAGAR, BANGALORE

        24.RATHNAMMA
           AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
           D/O LATE ABBAIAH
           R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
           1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
           NAGAR, BANGALORE

        25.SOONA
           AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
           S/O LATE ABBAIAH
           R/A NO: NO.50/5 BAZAR STREET
           1ST CROSS, HONARPET, VIVEK
           NAGAR, BANGALORE

        26.AYEZ SHARIFF
           AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
           S/O MOHAMMED AKBAR SHARIFF
           R/A: NO.21, 9TH CROSS, WILSON
           GARDEN, BANGALORE

27.         M. VASIM SHERIFF
      AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
      S/O MOHAMMED AKBAR SHARIFF
      R/A: NO.21, 9TH CROSS, WILSON
      GARDEN, BANGALORE                   ... RESPONDENTS

           (BY M/S.MYLARAIAH ASSOCIATES)

           RFA FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
      JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.10.2011 PASSED IN
                                7




O.S.NO.6272/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVIII ADDL. CITY
CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

      THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                       JUDGMENT

This appeal filed on 21.11.2011 was found defective and office has listed eight objections and required them to be complied. They were notified on 17.04.2012 and as they were not complied within the period prescribed, it was listed before this Court on 15.06.2012. Three weeks' time was granted on 15.06.2012 and again, a week's time was granted on 12.10.2012. Despite which, even today, the objections are not complied.

Under the circumstances, there is no gain in showing any indulgence. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.

SD/-

JUDGE vg/-