Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gauhati High Court

Shri Ram Prasad Sharma And 4 Ors vs Page No.# 2/2 on 1 February, 2019

Author: Suman Shyam

Bench: Suman Shyam

                                                                   Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010002372019




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                            Case No. : MFA 43/2019

         1:SHRI RAM PRASAD SHARMA AND 4 ORS
         S/O- LATE KRISHNA SHARMA, R/O- VILL- DINAJAN TEA ESTATE, P.S-
         PANITOLA, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM

         2: GURIA PRASAD SHARMA
          D/O- RAM PRASAD SHARMA
          R/O- VILL- DINAJAN TEA ESTATE
          P.S- PANITOLA
          DIST- TINSUKIA
         ASSAM

         3: RUPA PRASAD SHARMA
          D/O- RAM PRASAD SHARMA
          R/O- VILL- DINAJAN TEA ESTATE
          P.S- PANITOLA
          DIST- TINSUKIA
         ASSAM

         4: DIPAK PRASAD SHARMA
          S/O- RAM PRASAD SHARMA
          R/O- VILL- DINAJAN TEA ESTATE
          P.S- PANITOLA
          DIST- TINSUKIA
         ASSAM

         5: RAKESH PRASAD SHARMA
          S/O- RAM PRASAD SHARMA
          R/O- VILL- DINAJAN TEA ESTATE
          P.S- PANITOLA
          DIST- TINSUKIA
         ASSA

         VERSUS
                                                                                        Page No.# 2/2

             1:THE UNION OF INDIA
             REP. BY THE GM, N F RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI- 11

Advocate for the Petitioner     : MR D C K HAZARIKA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NF RLY




                                       BEFORE
                          HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

                                              ORDER

Date : 01-02-2019 Heard Ms. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, N. F. Railway appearing for the respondent. This appeal is preferred against the judgement and order dated 09/10/2018 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati in OA No. IIu-59/2017.

Admit the appeal.

Issue notice returnable in six weeks. Since the respondent is already represented by Mr. Sarma, no formal notice is required to be sent in this case. However, the appellants to furnish extra copy of the memo of appeal to Mr. Sarma within seven days from today.

Call for the LCR.

JUDGE Sukhamay Comparing Assistant