Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

M/S. Geo Franc (P) Ltd vs The State Of Kerala on 2 July, 2004

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2015/10TH ASHADHA, 1937

                                   WP(C).No. 8040 of 2015 (D)
                                      ---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------

        1. M/S. GEO FRANC (P) LTD, MARKET ROAD,
            COCHIN 18, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
            GEORGE AUGUSTINE.

        2. GEORGE AUGUSTINE, AGED 59,
            S/O.AUGUSTINE M.V., MANAGING DIRECTOR,
            M/S. GEO FRANC PVT.LTD, MARKET ROAD, KOCHI - 18.


            BY ADVS.SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
                          SRI.K.O.MANUEL (KOPRAMB)

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------

        1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
            DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION,
            SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695001.

        2. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OP.SOCIETIES,
           O/O.THE REGISTRAR, TRIVANDRUM-695001.

        3. THE KERALA STATE CO-OP. BANK LTD.,
            REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
            HEAD OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM - 695033.

        4. THE REGIONAL MANGER,
            THE KERALA STATE CO-OP. BANK LTD.,
            ERNAKULAM REGIONAL OFFICE, ANANDHI BUILDING,
            PULLEPPADY JN., DORAISWAMY IYER ROAD, KOCHI - 35.

        5. THE MANGER, KERALA STATE CO-OP. BANK LTD.,
            ERNAKULAM BRANCH, DORAISWAMY IYER ROAD,
            ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 35.


            R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.T.SHEEBA
            R3 TO R5 BY SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 01-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:
mbr/

WP(C).No. 8040 of 2015 (D)
-------------------------------------

                                         APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-------------------------------------

P1:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02.07.2004 GIVEN
          BY THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE
          3RD RESPONDENT BANK.

P2:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.10.2004 ISSUED BY THE
          2ND PETITIONER TO THE MANGING DIRECTOR OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT
          BANK.

P3:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 08.12.2004 ISSUED TO THE
          2ND PETITIONER.

P4:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO.20393/2007.

P5:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 09.10.2007.

P6:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PRE-SALE NOTICE DATED 02.02.2015.

P7:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ASWAS SCHEME UNDER CIRCULAR
          NO. 5/2015 DATED 22.01.2015.

P8:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ASWAS SCHEME UNDER CIRCULAR
          NO.9/2015 DATED 16.02.2015.

P9:       TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 04.03.2015 BEFORE
          THE 3RD AND 4TH RESPONDENTS.

P10:      TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ACKNOLWEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE
          3RD RESPONDENT.

P11:      TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF ACKNOWLEDMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE
          4TH RESPONDENT.




RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:                   NIL.


                                                     //TRUE COPY//


                                                     P.S.TO JUDGE


mbr/



                    A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
                    ------------------------------------
                       W.P.(C) No.8040 of 2015
                    -----------------------------------
                 Dated this the 1st day of July, 2015

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are unable to comply with the interim order. The petitioners submit that, they want to seek appropriate remedy and with that liberty, this writ petition may be closed.

In view of the above, leaving open all the issues and with liberty to seek appropriate remedy, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.

AV