Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Tata Capital Ltd vs Vardhman Metal Industries on 24 June, 2025

Author: Abdul Quddhose

Bench: Abdul Quddhose

                                                                               Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.165 of 2025

                                  THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 24.06.2025

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                        Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.165 of 2025

                     TATA CAPITAL LTD
                     By its Legal Manager
                     D.Kalaiarasan
                     Having its office at
                     1st Floor, Centennial Square,
                     6A - Dr Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam,
                     Chennai 600 024.                                                   ...   Petitioner
                                                Versus
                     1. VARDHMAN METAL INDUSTRIES
                     Rep by its Proprietor
                     Mr. Manoj Kumar
                     Ground Floor 13
                     New Timeryard Layout
                     RK Public School
                     Byatarayanapura new EXTN
                     Bangalore 560 085.
                     Also at

                     B2 703 Brahmagiri BDA Apartments
                     Malagala
                     Nagarabhavi 2nd Stage
                     Bangalore 560 072.

                     1/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 08:08:28 pm )
                                                                                    Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.165 of 2025

                     2. Mr.Manoj Kumar
                     B2 703 Brahmagiri BDA Apartments
                     Malagala, Nagarabhavi 2nd Stage
                     Bangalore 560 072.                                           ...             Respondents
                     Prayer : Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division) has been
                     filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
                     as amended Act, 2019, to appoint/substitute a Sole Arbitrator to
                     adjudicate upon the differences and disputes between the parties under
                     the said agreement, dated 30.08.2024 in respect of contract bearing
                     No.TCFBL0485000013156686.

                                     For Petitioner  : Mr.N.K. Vanan
                                     For Respondents : Set ex-parte
                                                       ORDER

The respondents have been served through Substituted Service. The names of the respondents are also printed in the cause list today. However, they have chosen not to enter appearance. Hence, the respondents are set ex-parte by this Court.

2. This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator by this Court.

3. There seems to be a dispute between the petitioner and the respondents arising out of the Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement, dated 30.08.2024. The Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement, dated 30.08.2024 contains an arbitration clause and the relevant clause is found in Clause 9 of the same.

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 08:08:28 pm ) Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.165 of 2025

4. The petitioner has invoked arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause by issuing notice to the respondents on 24.10.2024 to comply with the requirements of Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. No reply has been sent by the respondents to the said notice. Hence, it became necessary for the petitioner to file this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator. Since there exists an arbitration clause and the petitioner has also complied with the requirements of Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and since there is no consensus between the parties with regard to the name of the Arbitrator and since the respondents have been set ex-parte by this Court, this Court has to necessarily appoint an Arbitrator as prayed for in this petition.

5. For the foregoing reasons, this Arbitration Original Petition is allowed as prayed for by issuing the following directions :-

a) This Court appoints Mr.Abraham Vishal Jacob, Advocate, who is having office at 2nd Floor, A Block, Bannari Amman Towers, No.29, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004, (Mobile No.9884631228) as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties arising out of the Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement, dated 30.08.2024.
3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 08:08:28 pm ) Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.165 of 2025

(b) The Arbitrator shall be paid his remuneration / fees in accordance with the 4th schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

(c) Both the parties shall equally share the arbitrator's fees.

(d) The Arbitrator shall conduct the arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall complete the arbitration within the specified time as prescribed under the said Act.

24.06.2025 Index: Yes/ No Speaking order / Non speaking order Neutral citation : Yes / No vsi2 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 08:08:28 pm ) Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.165 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2 Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.165 of 2025 24.06.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 08:08:28 pm )