Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Nanda Ajinath Suste vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 16 December, 2020

Author: Shrikant D. Kulkarni

Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant D. Kulkarni

                                        1                  1022-WP-8208-2020

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         WRIT PETITION NO. 8208 OF 2020


Nanda W/o. Ajinath Suste                                     ...Petitioner

              Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                            ...Respondents


Mr A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for Petitioner
Mr A.B. Chate, A.G.P. for Respondents-State


                               CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
                                       SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
                               DATE         : 16th DECEMBER, 2020

 PER COURT :

1. The petitioner seeks permission to terminate the pregnancy.

2. The petitioner was referred to the Expert Committee at Government Medical College and Hospital at Aurangabad. The Expert Committee examined the petitioner and submitted the report. The report reads thus -

"12. Investigations done :
      Sr               Investigations
      No.              done
      01               CBC, URINE                Hb-9.1    gm%,            Urine
                       ROUTINE                   routine-WNL
      02               USG                       Single    live intrauterine
                                                 gestation with average
                                                 gestational age 25 weeks
                                                 1 day with echogenic
focus in left ventricle and there is shortening of all long bones suggestive of skeletal dysplasia ::: Uploaded on - 16/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2020 00:21:10 ::: 2 1022-WP-8208-2020
13. Additional findings and observations : N.A.
14. Physical fitness for termination.
A. Yes.
15. Recommendations by Medical Board for termination :
Recommended by Medical Method. Date and time: 15.12.2020. AT 2:30 PM."

3. The Expert Committee has recommended the termination of pregnancy.

4. In light of that, the petitioner is permitted to terminate the pregnancy at any Government recognized M.T.P. Center.

5. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ] [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] mta ::: Uploaded on - 16/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2020 00:21:10 :::