Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gurmeet Singh vs Financial Commissioner Revenue Punjab ... on 24 August, 2016

Author: Rameshwar Singh Malik

Bench: Rameshwar Singh Malik

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH

                            Civil Writ Petition No. 13850 of 2016 (O&M)
                            Date of Decision: 24.8.2016

Gurmeet Singh

                                                     .....Petitioner

                               Vs.


Financial Commissioner Revenue Punjab and others


                                                     .....Respondents


CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Present : Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate
          for the petitioner.

                 ****

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL)

CM No. 10131 of 2016 Applicant seeks preponement of the date of hearing. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant, instant application is allowed for the reasons stated therein. Date of hearing is preponed from 28.9.2016 to today, i.e. 24.8.2016.

CM stands disposed of.

CWP No. 13850 of 2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that he does not intend to press this petition qua writ in the nature of Certiorari. He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case the Deputy Commissioner, Fatehgarh Sahib-respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide his representation dated 24.12.2014 (Annexure P-8) within a reasonable time.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11-09-2016 02:44:40 ::: Civil Writ Petition No. 13850 of 2016 (O&M) 2 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, the Deputy Commissioner, Fatehgarh Sahib- respondent No.2 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide his representation dated 24.12.2014 (Annexure P-8) and decide the same, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present petition stands disposed of.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 24.8.2016 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11-09-2016 02:44:41 :::