Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Big Cinemas And Another vs Manoj Kumar on 22 November, 2019

     ITEM NO.22                              REGISTRAR COURT. 2                      SECTION XVII-A

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                     BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. SURINDER S. RATHI

     IA 1/2016,2/2016,91470/2016,1/2016, in Petition(s) for Special
     Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12773/2016

     BIG CINEMAS AND ANOTHER & ANR.                                             Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     MANOJ KUMAR                                                                Respondent(s)

     (Only T.P. (C) No. 1895/2018 is to be listed before Ld. Registrar
     Court.
      IA No. 91470/2016 - DIRECTION
      IA No. 1/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES
      IA No. 2/2016 - PERMISSION TO RAISE ADDITIONAL QUESTION OF LAW)

     WITH
     T.P.(C) No. 1895/2018 (XVI-A)

     Date : 22-11-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     For Petitioner(s)
                                            Mr.   Rajesh Kumar, AOR
                                           Mrs.   Anil Katiyar, AOR
                                            Mr.   A. Deb Kumar, Adv.
                                            Ms.   A. Deepa, Adv.
                                            Ms.   Gayatri Misra, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)
                                           Mr. A. N. Arora, AOR
                                           Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR
                                           M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR
                                           Mr. Madhavam Sharma, Adv.


                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

Appearance :Ld. counsel for petitioner is present.

Ld. Counsel for respondent is present.

Signature Not Verified T.P.(C) No. 1895/2018 Digitally signed by SWETA DHYANI Date: 2019.11.29 14:44:29 IST Reason:

As per High Court Report, Notice could not be served to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as postal remarks shows “undelivered”.

Hence, Ld. counsel for the petitioner shall file the fresh ITEM NO.22 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII-A particulars of the above respondents and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within a period of four weeks.

List again on 30.01.2020.

SURINDER S. RATHI Registrar pm