Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

P.N. Balaraman [Deceased vs The Special Commissioner And ... on 2 November, 2022

Author: N.Sathish Kumar

Bench: N.Sathish Kumar

                                                                      WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 02.11.2022

                                                   CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                        WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007

                    1. P.N. Balaraman [Deceased]
                    2. G.Vijayalakshmi
                       [P2 substituted as legal representative
                        of the deceased first petitioner as per
                        Order dated 15.07.2014 by CSKJ in
                        MP 1 of 2014 in W.P.No.14010 of 2007]
                                                                    ... Petitioner in W.P.No.
                                                                                14010 of 2007
                    P.R.Shanthana Battachari                        ... Petitioner in W.P.No.
                                                                                35698 of 2007
                                                       Vs

                    1. The Special Commissioner and Commissioner
                         of Land Administration,
                       Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

                    2. The District Revenue Officer,
                       Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

                    3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                       Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District.

                    4. A.Sundar,
                       Trustee Sri Vaikundavasa Perumal Koi,
                       46, Brahmin Street, Old Pallavaram, Chennai – 43.
                                                                    ... Respondents in both
                                                                              WPs.

                   1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007


                    Prayer in W.P.No.No.14010 of 2007 :- Writ Petitions filed under the
                    Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified
                    Mandamus to call for the entire records from the respondents in connection
                    with          the    impugned       orders   of    the    third    respondent      made     in
                    Na.Ka.No.2398/99D. Dated 24.01.2000 and Order of the second
                    respondent appellate authority dated 28.05.2003 made in Ni.Mu/26185/
                    2001          [H1]    and    the    Orders    of    the    first   respondent      made in
                    D.Dis.K3/R.P.10/2005 [23402/2003 dated 07.03.2007 and quash the same
                    and consequently forbear the respondents from in any way altering or
                    changing the registry in respect of the lands of the petitioner in Survey
                    No.192/1, Zamin Pallavaram Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram
                    District.


                    Prayer in W.P.No.No.35698 of 2007 :- Writ Petitions filed under the
                    Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified
                    Mandamus to call for the entire records from the respondents in connection
                    with the impugned orders of the third respondent Dated 24.01.2000 made
                    in Na.Ka.No.2398/99D and Order of the second respondent appellate
                    authority dated 28.05.2003 made in Ni.Mu/26185/2001 [H1] and the
                    Orders          of    the   first    respondent     made      in   D.Dis.K3/R.P.10/2005
                    [23402/2003] dated 07.03.2007 and quash the same and consequently
                    forbear the respondents from in any way altering or changing the registry
                    in respect of the lands of the petitioner in Survey No.196, 133.2B and 307
                    Zamin Pallavaram Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.



                   2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007


                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.Venkatachalapathy, SC
                                    in both WPs        for Mr.Ramesh Venkatachalapathy

                                  For Respondents    : Mr.D.Gopal,
                                    in both WPs.       Government Advocate – R1 to R3

                                                       Mr.A.K.Sriram
                                                       for M/s.S.S.Kailasam Associates – R4


                                           C O M M O N ORDER



These Writ Petitions have been filed to call for the entire records from the respondents in connection with the impugned orders of the third respondent Dated 24.01.2000 made in Na.Ka.No.2398/99D and Order of the second respondent appellate authority dated 28.05.2003 made in Ni.Mu/26185/2001 [H1] and the Orders of the first respondent made in D.Dis.K3/R.P.10/2005 [23402/2003] dated 07.03.2007 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from in any way altering or changing the registry in respect of the lands of the petitioner in Survey No.192/1, 196, 133.2B and 307 Zamin Pallavaram Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007

2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that despite communication sent to the petitioners, he is not able to get instructions from his clients. The same indicate that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting their petitions. These Writ Petitions are pending from the year 2007.

3. Hence, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

02.11.2022 vrc To,

1. The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vrc WP.Nos. 14010 & 35698 of 2007 02.11.2022 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis