Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Vidya Vikash High School (H.S.) & Anr vs The National Commission For on 3 October, 2018

Author: Arijit Banerjee

Bench: Arijit Banerjee

 28
akb
      03.10.18
                                W.P. 18443 (W) of 2018
                                 Vidya Vikash High School (H.S.) & Anr.
                                                -Versus-
                                      The National Commission for
                                 Minority Educational Institutions & Ors.


                 Mr. Saktinath Mukherjee
                 Mr. Kalimuddin Mondal
                 Mr. Sankar Biswas             ...For the Petitioners


                               Affidavit-of-service filed in Court be kept with
                 the record.
                               The petitioner School claims minority status. A
                 representation dated July 23, 2018 has been made by the
                 petitioner School to the National Commission for Minority
                 Educational Institutions, being the respondent No. 1,

requesting the respondent No. 1 to issue a minority status certificate to the School within the meaning of Section 11(f) of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004. The only prayer of the petitioners is that the said representation be disposed of at an early date.

Nobody appears for the respondents.

I direct the respondent No. 1 to consider the representation dated July 23, 2018 made by the petitioner School (Annexure 'P-11' to the writ petition) and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law and applicable Rules/Regulations/Circulars/Notifications, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order to the respondent No. 1 after giving an opportunity of hearing to the authorised representative of the petitioner School. The decision so taken by the respondent No. 1 shall be communicated to the petitioners within a week from the date of taking such decision.

I have not gone into the merits of the petitioners' claim.

Since, I have not called for any affidavits, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to be admitted by the respondents.

W.P. 18443 (W) of 2018 is accordingly disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.

( Arijit Banerjee, J. )