Karnataka High Court
M/S Orange County Resorts And Hotels ... vs The President on 21 April, 2011
Author: B.V.Nagarathna
Bench: B.V.Nagarathna
THIS if'J.F3. ES FILED F'R.f~%'r'If'\§G TO QGXRSH "YHE
RQSOLBTIQN C)? THE R2 P;<3.f'\ECHfix';'£3xT OT. 23.3.2923. fix COPY QF
Wi"§ICH ES '=.iE»'E§?.EI§"J PRQDUCEET} £2 MARKES AS fi'5a§"sJf'%§~F.,
wig PE"§"ET§{L>f\é C{}?'=«*IIf\&$ aw 90:2; Qamag T%~A§:S44.._J{:».§'Y,
COUR? mag THE ;F'O§LGWZ!\éG:»
oRo5g~
insagsmmtpeuuen,Unanefinafiérfiaécfiageégéuffié
refiaiufien dated 23/3x2a:1 passea by raspagaéh:~m§.2 4*'
Grama Sarzchas/at, as Agar Az}An.@;%;i1 re""?..E." a.ri5é'*the.s§emand ef
tax a5 per Anzrzexure 'V'I??<i"'V 'c.i;"a*t'<i;z::¥ ?."§';/
24 fiacc§:r{',3:i£:f:: g tolthev;§.é3ti§'i'§$:§%§é'?;~vihtgé'& camgany whéah
is raaniagf the jurisdiction 9?'
resQo§%V6é':§ts j;.v_a;;§'§V'2 £5'E'3V.§f'am'e§: §éEéézhayatg that Semen 199
ef sh§7Ké§na:a§% ?§n§5E%ét Raj Act, 1993 Cfierekufiien
yefarred tgfig 7ti":.=':l>,;.'f'V%C%:"}"';:*}r::v§de;: far ievy Q?' iax En termg 3%'
9f th"e""A::t, Accardérsg Ea the peiitéwer,
;*s::é$.§§.¥2:£i«§;h':;4"f:£r3'.:;% has igsueei a Cézcuiar Saited 24/SXZGGE
{Committee far fiza purgase $1' €¥><§ng the
;%%§3§ a7§:2E§§2.§' :'1.
._"annua! ':*::2::ia§ vaéue with ragam ta the §?"SpE¥"i:ieS taming
A :-«,r;é§L?é"é~«;: the jasrigééciéan cf the Emma Pamahayai,
§*%:§r iihe yea? 2§Q1'}»i§_, §*&$pz:::'2::é@r:E$ 1 gm')? 2
§e?;@§"r:'2§:*:é§fi Sig Ezféfiiééi gergéai %;:§§a;:& :3?' ihe g::§é:§ié$ne:'§
'gzgfifiérgg 3:36 gigs?-:§§;*;§E*«g1. 5§:":§§§$m§;¥E'{ :3? {ax W53 mafia,
x
\
' s
»::?'?'-"-ix
3
6. With the above observatésns, this writ: fiegiigian is
rejected. _ _ _ A4
.. " = . z
*m vs
.