Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Dayarachankadi Andru vs Raoof Dhayarachankandi on 14 November, 2019

Author: B.Sudheendra Kumar

Bench: B.Sudheendra Kumar

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                         PRESENT

      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 23RD KARTHIKA,
                          1941

                 OP(C).No.1438 OF 2018(O)

   AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA NO.2/2018 IN OS 30/2017 OF
                MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPURAM


PETITIONER/S:

           DAYARACHANKADI ANDRU
           AGED 63 YEARS, S/O AVULLA MONDYOTTUMMAL,
           NARIPPATTA AMSOM, THINAYOOR DESOM, VATAKARA
           TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

           BY ADVS.
           SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
           SRI.P.V.ANOOP
           SRI.M.P.PRIYESHKUMAR

RESPONDENT/S:

     1     RAOOF DHAYARACHANKANDI
           VALLILTHARA, 9KUNHAMI'S HOUSE) NARIPPATTA
           AMSOM, THINYOOR DESOM VATAKARA TALUK,
           KOZHIJKODE DISTRICT - 673101.

     2     MOOSSA CHAKKITTANKANDI
           AGED 65 YEARS, THANNERPANATHAL ,
           THANNEERPANTHAL (PO), VATAKARA TALUK,
           KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN- 673101.

     3     JAMEL DHAYARACHANKANDI AGED 41 YEARS SO MOIDU
           KAIVELI NARIPPATA AMSOM
           THINAYOOR DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE
           DISTRICT, PIN-673101.
 OP(C).No.1438 OF 2018(O)

                            ..2..

      4      KUNHAMMAD DHAYARACHANKANDI AGED 36 YEARS SO
             SOOPPY KAIVELI NARIPPATTA AMSOM THINAYOOR
             DESOM VAT


      5      RASEENA CHAKKITTANKANDI AGED 25 YEARS DO
             MOOSSA
             VALLITHARA, (KUNHAMI'S HOUSE)NARIPPATTA AMSOM,
             THINAYOOR DESOM VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE
             DISTRICT, PIN-673101.

             R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.P.S.APPU
             R1 BY ADV. SRI.AKHIL S.VISHNU
             R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.N.SUKUMARAN

     THIS OP (CIVIL)       HAVING BEEN   FINALLY HEARD ON
14.11.2019, THE COURT      ON THE SAME   DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 OP(C).No.1438 OF 2018(O)

                             ..3..




                           JUDGMENT

The order under challenge in this OP(C) is Ext.P5, which is appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC. Since there is provision for appeal, I am not inclined to entertain this OP(C).

Accordingly, this OP(C) stands closed. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to request the appellate court concerned for protection under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

Sd/-

B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE Bka/14.11.2019 OP(C).No.1438 OF 2018(O) ..4..

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A NO. 159/2017 IN O.S NO. 30/2017 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPPURAM.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS I.A NO. 2/2018 IN O.S NO. 30/2017 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPPURAM.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY O THE I.A NO. 611/2017 IN O.S NO. 30 2017 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIF COURT, NADAPPURAM EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/03/2018 IN O.P (CIVIL) NO. 933/2018.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 9/4/2018 IN I.A NO. 611/2017 AND I.A NO. 2/2018 IN O.S NO. 30/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF OF NADAPURAM.