Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Vijay Laxmi Sharma vs Santosh Tiwari 30 Wp227/765/2017 S. R. ... on 1 December, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                       1

                                                                    NAFR

             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                         W.P.(227) No. 945 of 2015

       Smt. Vijay Laxmi Sharma W/o Shri Pramod Kumar Sharma, Aged
       About 47 Years Director Mothers Care Nursery School, Balco And
       R/o House No. 254- B/1, Balco Nagar, Korba, Tahsil And District
       Korba Chhattisgarh, Civil And Revenue District Korba,
       Chhattisgarh                                  ---- Petitioner

                                   Versus

     1. Santosh Tiwari Treasurer, Kalyan Shiksha Samiti, Minimata Higher
        Secondary School, Balco, Balco Nagar, Tahsil And District Korba
        Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

     2. Khiladi Lal Pandey, Vice President, Kalyan Shiksha Samiti,
        Minimata Higher Secondary School, Balco, Balco Nagar, Tahsil
        And District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

     3. Dushyant Kumar Sharma, Secretary, Kalyan Shiksha Samiti,
        Minimata Higher Secondary School, Balco, Balco Nagar, Tahsil
        And District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

     4. B. K. Singh, Principal, Kalyan Shiksha Samiti, Minimata Higher
        Secondary School, Balco, Balco Nagar, Tahsil And District Korba
        Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
                                                     --- Respondents

For Petitioner : Ms. Trisha Das, Advocate.

For Respondents : None.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 01/12/18

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that final order has been passed and the Civil Suit No. 9-A/2015 has already been decided on 29.02.2016 and as such, the petition has now become infructuous. However, she prays for liberty to raise the grounds in appeal, if any, preferred by the petitioner.

2

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. As the civil suit has final been decided, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner.

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka