Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Seema Gupta vs M/O Health And Family Welfare on 29 May, 2023

                                       1
Item No. 15 (C-5)
                                                             O.A. No. 2847/2019

                    Central Administrative Tribunal
                      Principal Bench, New Delhi

                             O.A. No. 2847/2019

                         This the 31st day of May, 2023
               Hon'ble Mrs. Pratima K. Gupta, Member (J)
               Hon'ble Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)

        Seema Gupta, Age 43 years,
        Upper Division Clerk, Group C,
        Medical Council of India,
        R/o 37, Manohar Kunj, Gautam Nagar,
        New Delhi - 110043.
                                                                  ...Applicant
        (By Advocate(s): Mr. Sudhir Naagar)

                                       Versus

        1. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
        (now replaced by NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION)
        Through its Chairman Pocket-14, Sector-8,
        Phase-1, Dwarka
        New Delhi 110077

        2. SH. ASHOK KUMAR HARIT
        Dy. Secretary (Admn.)
        Medical Council of India
        Pocket-14, Sector-8,
        Phase-1, Dwarka New Delhi-110077

        3. Sh. Bhagwan Das Jain, Assistant Secretary
        Medical Council of India Pocket-14, Sector-8, Phase-1, Dwarka New
        Delhi 110077
                                                                ...Respondents
        (By Advocate(s): Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Mr. T Singhdev and Mr.
        Aabhaas Sukhramani)
                                           2
Item No. 15 (C-5)
                                                             O.A. No. 2847/2019

                                     O R D E R (ORAL)

Hon'ble Mrs. Pratima K. Gupta, Member (J):-

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant states that the grievance of the applicant have already been redressed by the respondents. Therefore, he seeks permission of the Tribunal to withdraw the present O.A.

2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant, permission is granted.

3. The O.A. is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.





        (Dr. Chhabilendra Roul)                  (Pratima K. Gupta)
             Member (A)                             Member (J)
        /dd/