Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 11]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Parmeshwar Prasad Gupta 21 Wa/620/2019 ... on 20 December, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                    1
                                                          WA No. 613 of 2019


                                                                   NAFR

        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                         WA No. 613 of 2019

   1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of
      Panchayat And Social Welfare, DKS Bhawan (Now Mahanadi
      Bhawan), Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

   2. The Director Directorate Of Panchayat And Social Services,
      DKS Bhawan (Now Mahanadi Bhawan), Mantralaya, Naya
      Raipur Chhattisgarh.

   3. Deputy Director Panchayat And Social Welfare, Ambikapur,
      District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

                                                         ---- Appellants

                               Versus

   1. Parmeshwar Prasad Gupta S/o Late Shri Ram Vrit Sao Aged
      About 53 Years Posted As Varisht Antrik Lekha Parikshan Avam
      Kararopan Adhikari, Presently Posted At Balrampur, Janpad
      Panchayat Balrampur, District Surguja (Now Balrampur)
      Chhattisgarh.

                                                       ---- Respondent



For Appellant-State            :-        Shri Amit Bakshi, PL
For Respondent                 :-        Shri K. Rohan, Advocate


         Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra &
            Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya

                           Order On Board

                                    By

                      Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

2 WA No. 613 of 2019 20/12/2019

1. Although, the Writ Appeal is posted on default, however, learned counsel for the parties would jointly submit that the matter in issue is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in the matter of State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Satish Kumar Shrivastava in WA No.389 of 2019 decided on 29.08.2019. A copy of the order has been placed before us for perusal.

2. In view of the statement made, the Writ Appeal is dismissed in the same terms as in the matter of State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Satish Kumar Shrivastava (Supra).

3. Copy of order passed in WA No.389 of 2019 is retained in the record of this Writ Appeal.

                   SD/-                                 SD/-
            (Prashant Kumar Mishra)              (Gautam Chourdiya)
                  Judge                               Judge

Ayushi