Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Arunachalam vs The Joint Registrar Of on 14 March, 2019

Author: D. Krishnakumar

Bench: D. Krishnakumar

                                                        1

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED: 14.03.2019

                                                     CORAM

                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR

                                            W.P.No.29868 of 2014
                                            and M.P.No.1 of 2014


                     R.Arunachalam                                       .. Petitioner

                                                       Vs.

                     1.The Joint Registrar of
                         Co-operative Societies,
                       Tiruvarur Region,
                       Tiruvarur District.

                     2.The Deputy Registrar of
                         Co-operative Societies,
                       Tiruvarur Region,
                       Tiruvarur District.

                     3.The President/Special Officer,
                       10798, Thillaivilagam Primary Agricultural
                       Co-Operative Credit Society Limited,
                       Thillaivilagam & Post,
                       Thiruthuraipoondi Taluk,
                       Tiruvarur District.                               .. Respondents


                     PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India to issue WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respondents to pay
                     salary from 01.10.2005 to 31.03.2008 including increments and
                     revised salary, salary as per G.O.189, dated 17.11.2009 for the period
                     from 01.04.2008 to 29.09.2009, salary for the period from 23.04.2011
                     to 31.08.2012 in the revised scale of pay, Employees Provident Fund.
                     Gratuity and Encashment of Earned Leave etc., to the petitioner with


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                        2

                     interest at the rate of 24% per annum from the due date till the date
                     of realization.


                                 For petitioner   : Mr.R.Raja

                                 For R1 & R2      : Ms.T.Girija,
                                                    Government Advocate

                                 For R3           : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram,
                                                    Special Government Pleader

                                                    *****

                                                   ORDER

The petitioner has filed the Writ Petition praying to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respondents to pay salary from 01.10.2005 to 31.03.2008 including increments and revised salary, salary as per G.O.189, dated 17.11.2009 for the period from 01.04.2008 to 29.09.2009, salary for the period from 23.04.2011 to 31.08.2012 in the revised scale of pay, Employees Provident Fund. Gratuity and Encashment of Earned Leave etc., to the petitioner with interest at the rate of 24% per annum from the due date till the date of realization.

2.The petitioner cannot seek his remedy before the respondent Management which cannot be revised as per the above said G.O.No.189 dated 17.11.2009 and there is no execution of agreement entered between the petitioner and the respondent under Section http://www.judis.nic.in 3 12(3) of the Industrial Dispute Act or under Section 90 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 or under Section 153 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Society Act. Further, in the light of the counter filed by the first and second respondent stating that the petitioner's representation shall be forwarded to the third respondent Society for considering the said representation to settle the retirement benefits. Therefore, the third respondent/Society has to take a decision for the petitioner's representation.

3.In the light of the law settled by this Court in the case of K. MARAPPAN VS. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAMAKKAL reported in 2006 (4) CTC 689, the petitioner is not entitled to file a writ petition. Further, when the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 90 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983, without exhausting the same, filing a writ petition is not maintainable either on law or on facts.

4.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is not maintainable, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition and the same is not maintainable and the petitioner is directed to seek his remedy either under Section 90 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 or under Section 153 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983.

http://www.judis.nic.in 4

5.Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed as not maintainable and it is left open to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. However there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

14.03.2019 Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ah To

1.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tiruvarur Region, Tiruvarur District.

2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tiruvarur Region, Tiruvarur District.

3.The President/Special Officer, 10798, Thillaivilagam Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, Thillaivilagam & Post, Thiruthuraipoondi Taluk, Tiruvarur District.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5 D. KRISHNAKUMAR,J., ah W.P.No.29868 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 14.03.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in