Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Ajantha Colour Lab vs State Of Kerala Rep. By Deputy on 14 August, 2007

Author: K.T. Sankaran

Bench: H.L.Dattu, K.T.Sankaran

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

ST Rev No. 310 of 2003()


1. AJANTHA COLOUR LAB,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY DEPUTY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :14/08/2007

 O R D E R
                      H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J.
             ...................................................................................
                    SALES TAX REVISION No. 310 OF 2003
             ...................................................................................
                           Dated this the 14th August , 2007

                                              O R D E R

H.L. Dattu, C.J.:

This revision petition is filed questioning the legality or otherwise of the orders passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in T.A.No. 298 of 1995 dated 25.09.2002. The assessment year in question is 1993-94.

2. The questions of law framed in this revision for our consideration and decision are identical to that of the questions of law raised in Sales Tax Revision No.287 of 2003, which is disposed of by us today. Since the questions of law raised are identical to that of the questions of law raised in Sales Tax Revision No 287 of 2003, this Revision is also disposed of in terms of the order passed by us in Sales Tax Revision No.287 of 2007.

3. Accordingly, the questions of law framed by the assessee is answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. Therefore, the Revision case requires to be rejected and it is rejected. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the parties are directed to bear their own costs.

Ordered accordingly .

H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE.

lk H.L. DATTU, C.J.& K.T. SANKARAN, J.

.......................................................

S.T.REV. No. 310 OF 2003 ....................................................... Dated this the 14th August, 2007 O R D E R