Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

B.Reghuram Shetty vs State Of Kerala on 22 June, 2023

Author: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
             Thursday, the 22nd day of June 2023 / 1st Ashadha, 1945

                             CRL.MC NO. 1574 OF 2023


CC 606/2021 COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -V, TVM (SPECIAL COURT-
MARKLIST CASES), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM


  PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED:


       B.REGHURAM SHETTY, AGED 80 YEARS, S/O. SHAMBU SHETTTY,
       CHAIRMAN,GOD'S OWN COUNTRY HEALTH RESORT INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,
       DEVASWOM BOARD JUNCTION, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695003

  RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS:

     1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
        KERALA, PIN - 682031
     2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER ATTIPPRA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,
        PIN - 695583


       This Criminal misc. case coming on for orders upon perusing the
  application and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. G.SUDHEER,
  R.HARIKRISHNAN (H-308), SMRITHI S.S., Advocates for the petitioner, the
  PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the respondents, the court passed the following:
                                 RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.
                               -------------------------------------
                                 Crl.M.C No. 1574 of 2023
                            -------------------------------------------
                           Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2023


                                               ORDER

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who submits that the prosecution proceedings initiated at the instance of the village officer cannot be sustained under law. He would further contend that the action is also violative of the law laid down in Firose v. Revenue Divisional Officer [2011 (1) KLT 868], wherein it was held that prosecution can stand only if conversion is after notification is published. According to the learned counsel, the complaint was registered on 28.6.2019, and the Data Bank was published only on 22.1.2021.

Having regard to the submissions advanced, there will be an interim order, as prayed for, for a period of eight weeks.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE Sru 22-06-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar