Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court of India

M/S. National Aluminium Co. Ltd vs Raj Kishore @ Sahu Jena & Anr on 9 January, 1996

Equivalent citations: 1996 SCC (3) 44, JT 1996 (1) 617, AIRONLINE 1996 SC 1162

Author: K. Ramaswamy

Bench: K. Ramaswamy

           PETITIONER:
M/S. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD.

	Vs.

RESPONDENT:
RAJ KISHORE @ SAHU JENA & ANR.

DATE OF JUDGMENT:	09/01/1996

BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)

CITATION:
 1996 SCC  (3)	44	  JT 1996 (1)	617
 1996 SCALE  (1)SP34


ACT:



HEADNOTE:



JUDGMENT:

O R D E R Leave granted.

Though notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res integra. They are covered by the judgment of this Court in U.P. Avas Vikas Evam Parishad v. Gyan Devi [Dead] by Lrs. & Ors. [JT 1994 (7) SC 304]. In that view, the appellant being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul.

The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.