Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Baldev Chand Saini vs State Of H.P. And Others on 21 March, 2015

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA




                                                                          .
                                            CWP No. 969 of 2013-G.





                                            Date of decision: 21.03.2015.





    Baldev Chand Saini                                              .....Petitioner.

                                    Versus





    State of H.P. and others                                        .....Respondents.



    Coram


    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?1
    For the Petitioner              :       Mr.Sat Parkash, Advocate vice


                                            Mr.Naveen K.Bhardwaj, Advocate.

    For the Respondents :                   Ms.Meenakshi     Sharma  and
                                            Mr.Rupinder Singh, Additional




                                            Advocate Generals.





    Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. (Oral) .

It is represented by learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner that this case is squarely covered by the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Punjab and others etc. versus Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc. JT 2015 (1) SC 95.

2. This aspect of the matter is required to be considered by the respondents. Accordingly, this writ petition itself is directed to be treated as representation to the respondent No. 2 in light of the averments made therein and also taking into consideration the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rafiq Masih's case supra and make a decision within a period of six weeks from today. Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:50:44 :::HCHP 2

3. Needless to say that the order shall be a speaking one. In the event of order being against the petitioner, he is at liberty to .

approach the Court of a competent jurisdiction for the redressal of his grievances.

4. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms so also the pending application, if any.

March 21, 2015.

    (krt)             r           to             (Tarlok Singh Chauhan),
                                                         Judge.









                                            ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:50:44 :::HCHP