Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Dwarkadas Gulabchand Loya Thr Lrs ... vs M.I.D.C. Thr Regional Officer, Latur ... on 21 February, 2019

Author: T.V. Nalawade

Bench: T.V. Nalawade

                                   (1)         CA No.14773/2018 + ORS

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                           BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
                 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14773 OF 2018
                                    IN
                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 2189 OF 2016

 Chandrakant Eknath Kulkarni.
     Applicant.
          Versus
 M.I.D.C. Through Divisional Office,
 Latur & another.                                           Respondents.


                                  WITH
                 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13562 OF 2017
                                    IN
                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 2188 OF 2016

 Gangaram Yashwant Wadgave.                                 Applicant.
          Versus
 M.I.D.C. Through Divisional Office,
 Latur & another.                                           Respondents.


                                  WITH
                 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8104 OF 2018
                                    IN
                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 2191 OF 2016

 Dwarkadas Gulabchand Loya.                                 Applicant.
          Versus
 M.I.D.C. Through Divisional Office,
 Latur & another.                                           Respondents.




::: Uploaded on - 18/03/2019              ::: Downloaded on - 20/03/2019 23:20:03 :::
                                        (2)             CA No.14773/2018 + ORS

                                       WITH
                 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11920 OF 2018
                                        IN
                      FIRST APPEAL NO. 2197 OF 2016

 Kashibai Deelip Madane.                                            Applicant.
          Versus
 M.I.D.C. Through Divisional Office,
 Latur & another.                                                   Respondents.
                                        ***
 Mr. G.R.Syed, Advocate for the applicants.
 Mr. R.B. Bagul, A.G.P. for the State.
 Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent No.1.
                                        ***
                               CORAM :        T.V. NALAWADE AND
                                              SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.


                               Dated     :    21 February 2019.
 ORDER :

-

. During speaking to minutes, learned Counsel for the applicants submitted that for convenience to the parties disbursement of the amount may be made by the office of this Court as the amount is deposited in this Court. He submitted that as per direction given by the Apex Court, the security will be furnished for the satisfaction of the Reference Court before the Reference Court. That is permitted after hearing the Counsel for other side. So, the amount is not to be sent to Reference Court at ::: Uploaded on - 18/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 20/03/2019 23:20:03 ::: (3) CA No.14773/2018 + ORS present and the amount can be disbursed by the office of this Court, after receiving the order of Reference Court in respect of furnishing the security, as aforesaid.

        ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL)                ( T.V. NALAWADE )
             JUDGE                               JUDGE
 vdd/




::: Uploaded on - 18/03/2019              ::: Downloaded on - 20/03/2019 23:20:03 :::