Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Atul Sadanand Kamath vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 April, 2026

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                            -1-
                                                       NC: 2026:KHC:19133
                                                      WP No. 5423 of 2026


                 HC-KAR



                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

                                          BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                          WRIT PETITION NO. 5423 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
                 BETWEEN:

                 ATUL SADANAND KAMATH
                 SON OF SADANAND
                 AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
                 RAGHAVENDRA KAMATH
                 RESIDING AT NO. 4A
                 DEAVILLE APARTMENTS
                 NO. 19, CHURCH STREET
                 BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                                             ...PETITIONER
                 (BY SRI ASHWIN RADHAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE)

                 AND:
Digitally
signed by        THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SANJEEVINI J
KARISHETTY       BY HALASURU POLICE STATION
Location: High   BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY
Court of
Karnataka        STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                 HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                 HIGH COURT BUILDING
                 BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                                           ...RESPONDENT
                 (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP)

                      THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
                 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C
                 PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO FURNISH A COPY
                 OF FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR. NO. 755/1996, FOR THE
                                  -2-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC:19133
                                             WP No. 5423 of 2026


HC-KAR



OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SS. 3 AND 4 OF THE PRIZE CHITS
AND MONEY CIRCULATION SCHEMES (BANNING) ACT, 1978,
REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT HALASURU POLICE,
PENDING ON THE FILE OF X ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE, MAYOHALL, BENGALURU.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


                          ORAL ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:

"a. Call for the relevant records;
b. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ to direct the Respondent to furnish a copy of FIR & Complaint in Cr. No. 755/1996, for the offences punishable u/ss. 3 and 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, registered by the Respondent Halasuru Police, pending on the file of X Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayohall, Bengaluru;
C. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ to direct the Respondent to furnish a copy of Final Report in C.C. No.22796/1998 (arising out of Crime No. 755/1996 registered by the Respondent Halasuru Police for offences u/ss. 3 and 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, pending on the file of X Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayohall, Bengaluru;
d. Quash all further proceedings in C.C. No. 22796/1998, arising out of Crime No. 755/1996 registered by the Respondent Halasuru Police, for offences punishable under u/ss. 3 and 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 pending on the file of the Ld. X Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayohall, Bengaluru.
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:19133 WP No. 5423 of 2026 HC-KAR e. Issue any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in light of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Heard Sri Ashwin Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri B.N.Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:

The petitioner claims to be a businessman and is residing in Bengaluru for the last 40 years. He is an Indian passport holder for the last 45 years, after it having been granted in the year 1981. He has renewed the passport multiple times. The petitioner on 04.03.2025 applies online for renewal of his passport. The Regional Passport Officer then issues an acknowledgment that the renewal is granted and the passport is issued to the petitioner. The Cubbon Park Police, in the interregnum conducted background verification as was necessary under the Indian Passport Act, 1967 and informed that the name of the petitioner is indicated as an accused in Crime No.755/1996, before the Halasruru Police Station, for the -4- NC: 2026:KHC:19133 WP No. 5423 of 2026 HC-KAR offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, a crime of 30 years vintage, which is still pending. The police appear to have conducted investigation and after investigation, have filed their final report / charge sheet in C.C.No.22796/1998 for the afore-quoted offences, which is still pending before the 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayohall, Bengaluru.

4. The petitioner claims that he has received the said information and had no knowledge about the crime that is registered against him or the charge sheet being filed in the said crime. The petitioner then seeks to secure an information and the police informed that they do not have any records in the police station concerning the aforesaid crime or the charge sheet. The petitioner is said to have knocked at the doors of the police station twice or thrice, only to get the same answer. The Regional Passport Officer on the information received by the police station sought explanation at the hands of the petitioner, as to why the information regarding the pendency of the criminal case is not divulged. The petitioner then prefers an application under the provisions of the Right to Information -5- NC: 2026:KHC:19133 WP No. 5423 of 2026 HC-KAR Act. Even then, the police have rendered certain reply/documents to the applications submitted under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, which are not in full. The petitioner sought to access the police IT database and there was no indication of the crime or the records of the charge sheet. It is under these circumstances that petitioner is before this Court in the subject petition.

5. A perusal at the pleadings made in the petition would clearly indicate that permitting to conduct trial in the proceedings in C.C.No.22796/1996, pending before the 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayohall, Bengaluru (arising out of Crime No.755/1996 of Halasuru Police Station), would undoubtedly become an abuse of the process of the law and weapon of harassment for the simple reason that the records of crime or the charge sheet is untraceable today, as it is 30 years old. If the police have failed in their statutory duty to maintain and furnish the records, the petitioner cannot now be asked to bear the sword of the crime hanging on his head. -6-

NC: 2026:KHC:19133 WP No. 5423 of 2026 HC-KAR

6. A perusal at the complaint so registered would clearly indicate that it was registered for the purpose of recovery of money. Therefore, all of these circumstances, where there are no records to know the details of crime or the charge sheet filed after the investigation by the police, permitting further proceedings to continue against this petitioner would only be a sword hanging on the head of the petitioner, in the case of decades. In that light, I deem it appropriate to exercise my jurisdiction under Section 528 of the BNSS, Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the earlier regime and obliterate the crime so registered against the petitioner.

7. In view of the obliteration of the proceedings in C.C.No.22796/1998, prayer Nos.1 and 2 do not survive for consideration.

8. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER a. The writ petition is allowed.
-7-
NC: 2026:KHC:19133 WP No. 5423 of 2026 HC-KAR b. The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.22796/1998, pending before the 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayohall, Bengaluru, stand quashed.
Sd/-
(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 60