Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 13, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Raja @ Deepak Nayak vs State Of Odisha ... Opp. Party on 4 November, 2020

Author: S.K. Sahoo

Bench: S.K. Sahoo

                            BLAPL No. 1921 of 2020




                   Raja @ Deepak Nayak                  ...          Petitioner

                                                    -VERSUS-

                   State of Odisha                      ...        Opp. party




07.   04.11.2020               The   matter   is    taken     up   through   Video
                   Conferencing.
                               Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
                   learned counsel for the State.
                               This is an application under section 439 of
                   Cr.P.C. in connection with G.R. Case No.237 of 2019
                   arising out of Ranpur P.S. Case No.170 of 2019 pending
                   in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Ranpur for offences
                   punishable under sections 395/411/412/414/120-B/109
                   of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-B)(a)/27 of
                   the Arms Act and section 9-B of Explosive Act and
                   sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act.
                               The petitioner moved an application for bail
                   before the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge,
                   Nayagarh which was rejected on 06.12.2019.
                               Considering the submission made by the
                   learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in
                   judicial custody since 27.09.2019, charge sheet has
                   already been submitted under sections 395/411/412/
                   414/120-B/109 of the Indian Penal Code and sections
                   25(1-B)(a)/27 of the Arms Act and section 9-B of
     Explosive Act and sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Explosive
    Substances Act and the F.I.R. has been lodged against
    unknown     persons       on   19.08.2019   and   no   test
    identification parade has been conducted to establish the
    complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime and after
    hearing the learned counsel for the State who submitted
    that the case diary does not indicate holding of any T.I.
    parade but stated that the petitioner has got criminal
    antecedents and he further submits that the petitioner
    admitted before police that he received the stolen
    property which is a motor cycle, I am inclined to release
    the petitioner on bail.
            Let the petitioner be released on bail in the
    aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/-
    (rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties
    each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
    Court in seisin over the matter with further conditions as
    the learned court may deem just and proper.
          The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
          Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.



                                         .............................
                                          S.K. Sahoo, J.

P