Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

G.Samundeswari vs The District Collector on 30 March, 2026

Author: S. M. Subramaniam

Bench: S. M. Subramaniam

    2026:MHC:1351
                                                                       WP No. 6579 of 2026


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                              DATED: 30-03-2026
                                                   CORAM
                                  THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
                                                     AND
                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
                                              WP No. 6579 of 2026

                G.Samundeswari
                                                                           ..Petitioner
                                                      Vs
                1. The District Collector,
                   Thiruvallur,
                   Thiruvallur District 602 001.

                2. The Regional Deputy Commissioner,
                   Great Chennai Corporation,
                   Central - Zone, Pulla Avneue,
                   Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030.

                3. The Assistant Commissioner,
                   Greater Chennai Corporation,
                   Zone 7, Ambathru,
                   Chennai 600 053.

                4. The Executive Engineer,
                   Greater Chennai Corporation,
                   Zone 7, Ambathur,
                   Chennai 600 053.

                5. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                   Ambathur Taluk, Thiruvallur District,
                   Ambathur Estate Road,
                   Padikuppam, Chennai 600 101.

                6. The Tasildhar – Ambathur,
                   Ambathur Taluk,
                   Thiruvallur Distrct,
                   Chennai 600 053.

                7. K. Ranga (alias) Ranganayaki


                                                                              __________
                                                                               Page1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   WP No. 6579 of 2026


                8. Kamalraj

                                                                                   ..Respondents

                          Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying
                to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 6 to remove the
                encroachment done by the 7th and 8th Respondents on the common pathway
                adjacent to survey no 282/3 measuring to an extent of 3660 Sq.ft ( as per
                sketch) out of entire lands of village Adangal Extract and FMB sketch for
                gramanatham belongs to Kannathal Temple situated at Village No. 18
                Ambathur Village, Ambathur Taluk and Thiruvallur District running North to
                South with originally 6 Feet width and to recover encroached land by the 7 th
                and 8th Respondents, which they are illegally occupied by creating forgery
                documents.


                              For Petitioner :         Mr.Najeeb Usman Khan

                              For Respondents :        Mr.T.Arunkumar,
                                                       Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1, R5 & R6

                                                       Mr.E.C.Ramesh,
                                                       Standing Counsel for R2 to R4

                                                       Mr.L.K.Charles Alexander for R7 & R8

                                                        ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the Respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment done by the 7 th and 8th Respondents on the common pathway adjacent to survey No.282/3 measuring to an extent of 3660 Sq.ft. (as per sketch) out of entire lands of Village Adangal Extract and FMB sketch for gramanatham, belongs to Kannathal Temple situated at Village No. 18 Ambathur Village, Ambathur Taluk and Thiruvallur District running North to __________ Page2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6579 of 2026 South with originally 6 Feet width and to recover encroached land by the 7 th and 8th Respondents, which they are illegally occupied by creating forged documents.

2. The Tahsildar, Ambathur Taluk has already addressed a letter to the Executive Engineer, Zone-7, Chennai Corporation regarding the survey conducted in respect of the subject property. As per the Tahsildar’s letter, the subject property is classified as Sarkar Poramboke and Grama Natham. In the column Note it has been stated as “Thamarai Kulam” (lotus pond).

3. Therefore, it is stated that there was a water body in the said property and further the classification shows that it is Government Poramboke and Grama Natham. Even if it is a Grama Natham as per RSO-21, the Government has to regulate by following the procedures as contemplated under the Revenue Standing Orders. In the absence of any assignment under the Authority of law, no one can claim ownership in respect of the public property including Grama Natham, which is meant for construction of dwelling houses and for providing public service.

4. As of now, the Tahsildar has submitted a report to the Corporation and the Corporation Authorities have to verify the facts and thereafter proceed with in accordance with law and by following the procedures and by affording opportunity to the encroachers, if any, identified.

__________ Page3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6579 of 2026

5. The learned counsel for the respondents 7 and 8 would submit that the claim of the writ petitioner is false and based on fraudulent documents.

6. The respondents 7 and 8 are at liberty to submit all documents to the competent Authority for consideration. All further enforcement actions are to be initiated by following the procedures and by affording opportunity to all the parties. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(S.M.S.,J.) (K.B.,J.) 30-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSA __________ Page4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6579 of 2026 To

1. The District Collector, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District 602 001.

2. The Regional Deputy Commissioner, Great Chennai Corporation, Central - Zone, Pulla Avneue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030.

3. The Assistant Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Zone 7, Ambathru, Chennai 600 053.

4. The Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation, Zone 7, Ambathur, Chennai 600 053.

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambathur Taluk, Thiruvallur District, Ambathur Estate Road, Padikuppam, Chennai 600 101.

6. The Tasildhar – Ambathur, Ambathur Taluk, Thiruvallur Distrct, Chennai 600 053.

__________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6579 of 2026 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

DSA WP No. 6579 of 2026 30-03-2026 __________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis