Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Kalyan Krishna Nandy vs Unknown on 10 April, 2015

Author: Ashim Kumar Roy

Bench: Ashim Kumar Roy

                                                    1




10.04.2015
   pk
                                  CRM No. 3063 of 2015
         In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
         the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 1.4.15 in connection with
         Barrackpore Women P.S. Case No. 11/15 dated 7.2.15 under Sections
         498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the
         Dowry Prohibition Act.
                                         And
         In the matter of:- Kalyan Krishna Nandy
                                                 Petitioner

         Mr. Debasis Kar                       for the petitioner

         Mrs. Sujata Das                       for the State

         Mr. Avinaba Patra           for the de facto complainant



                 The    petitioner,      apprehending      arrest   in   connection    with

         Barrackpore Women P.S. Case No. 11/15 dated 7.2.15 under Sections

         498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the

         Dowry Prohibition Act has come to this court for anticipatory

         bail.



             Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

         Perused the case diary.

             The petitioner is the husband.

                 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

         that in terms of an order passed in connection with a Matrimonial

         Suit, his client is paying a sum of Rs. 7,000/- per month to the

         de facto complainant/wife as alimony pendente lite. He further

         submits       due   to   some   personal       difficulties,    there   was   some

         outstanding and out of the same, he is now paying a sum of Rs.
                                          2




1.

05 lakhs by a 'Pay Order' to the de facto complainant/wife, who is personally present in court. He further assure this court that within two weeks the balance outstanding, if any, shall be liquidated after obtaining the statements of account from the de facto complainant. It is also assured by the learned counsel for the petitioner that henceforth there will be no single default in making the payment of maintenance.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the de facto complainant submits that many stridhan articles are still retained by the petitioner.

In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if there is anything still retained that would be returned within seven days.

Having regard to above, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer upon furnishing a bond of Rs.5,000/- and on further condition that after release the petitioner shall surrender before the regular court within four weeks thereafter.

3

This order is subject to the conditions as laid down in sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Ashim Kumar Roy, J.) (Malay Marut Banerjee, J.)