Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Itd Cementation India Ltd - Jv vs Pune Municipal Corporation on 1 July, 2024

2024:BHC-OS:9527


                   Digitally
                   signed by                                      1                       55-CARBP(L) 16869-24.doc
                   MUGDHA
         MUGDHA    MANOJ
         MANOJ     PARANJAPE
         PARANJAPE Date:
                   2024.07.02
                   15:24:24
                   +0530                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                                       IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION


                                     COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.16869 OF 2024


                          ITD Cementation India Limited (JV)                               ... Petitioner
                                    V/s.
                          Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr.                                ... Respondents
                                                                      -----
                          Mr. Akshay Zantye for the Petitioner.
                          Mr. Vishwanath Patil, Mr. Akshay Naidu, Mr. Kedar Nhavkar for Respondent
                          No.1.
                                                                      -----


                                                               CORAM :            ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
                                                               DATE           :   1ST JULY 2024
                          P.C. :


1. The captioned Commercial Arbitration Petition is filed under Section 29 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal.

2. I am informed that this is second application for extension of time. The same is not opposed by Respondent No.1.

                                Mugdha                                                                                  1 of 2



                        ::: Uploaded on - 02/07/2024                              ::: Downloaded on - 03/07/2024 05:18:45 :::
                                              2                   55-CARBP(L) 16869-24.doc


3. Learned Counsel for the parties informed the Court that arguments have been concluded in the arbitration proceedings and it is only for passing arbitral award.

4. Given this, in the interest of justice, I deed it fit to grant an extension as prayed for. Hence, the captioned Commercial Arbitration Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under :-

"(a) Pass an Order extending the period for passing of the Award by the Ld. Arbitral Tribunal comprising of Shri. S. B. Tamsekar as the Sole Arbitrator by a period of 3(three) months from 31/05/2024 to 31/08/2024"

5. The captioned Commercial Arbitration Petition is thus disposed of.

6. It is made clear that the time of three months shall commence from the date on which this order is uploaded.





                                                                  (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)




      Mugdha                                                                                   2 of 2



::: Uploaded on - 02/07/2024                             ::: Downloaded on - 03/07/2024 05:18:45 :::