Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Mrs. Diksha Bharti vs The Union Of India on 29 November, 2012

      

  

  

 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

OA No.3936/2012
MA No.3354/2012

New Delhi this the 29th day of November, 2012

HONBLE MR. G. GEORGE PARACKEN, MEMBER (J)
HONBLE MRS. MANJULIKA GAUTAM, MEMBER (A)

Mrs. Diksha Bharti,
D/o Shri Bipin Kumar Singh,
R/o 7/95, Lodhi Colony,
New Delhi-110003.						Applicant.

(By Advocate Shri Rajeev Saxena)

Versus

1.	The Union of India
	Ministry of Personnel,
	Public Grievances and Pensions,
	Staff Selection Commission Hqrs.
	Through Secretary,
	Department of Personnel and Training,
	North Block, 
New Delhi-110001.

2.	Staff Selection Commission (Northern Region),
	Through Regional Director (NR),
	Government of India,
	Block-12, CGO Complex,
	Lodhi Road,
	New Delhi-110003.					Respondents.

(By Advocate : Shri S.M. Arif)

O R D E R (ORAL)

Shri G. George Paracken:

This OA has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to call the applicant for interview for appointment to the post of Junior Translator (CSOLS) & Senior Translator and Junior Translator in Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India and Hindi Pradhayapak in CHTI, by granting the relaxation in EQ-II on account of the applicant securing 69% marks in EQ-I in terms of the recruitment notice dated 24.09.2011.

2. Counsel for the applicant seeks to file some fresh documents in this case. Notice in this case has not so far been issued.

3. Let the applicant file a fresh OA incorporating all the relevant documents. However, this OA stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

(Mrs. Manjulika Gautam)  	     	( G. George Paracken )
    Member (A)				               Member (J)

/Jyoti/