Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Smt. Rukmani Devi Bangur And Ors vs The Joint Director Of Industries on 30 January, 2024

OD-9
                                ORDER SHEET

                     IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                               ORIGINAL SIDE

                               IA No. GA/2/2023
                                 In CS/75/2020

                   SMT. RUKMANI DEVI BANGUR AND ORS
                                  VS
                   THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES

  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Date : January 30, 2024.

Appearance:

Ms. Usha Doshi, Adv.
Ms. Priyanka Gope, Adv.
...for the plaintiff Ms. Noelle Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. P. Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Shourya Samanta, Adv.
...for the state The Court: The plaintiff has filed an application being GA/2/2023 praying for recording the death of the plaintiff no.2 and substituting the executor of the alleged last Will and Testament of Smt. Pushpa Devi Bangur who was plaintiff no.2 in the instant suit.
Counsel for the defendant submits that the plaintiff no.2 is having other legal heirs other than the executor of the last Will and Testament but the plaintiff has not taken any steps for substitution of the other legal heirs of Smt. Pushpa Devi Bangur but only filed an application for recording the death of the plaintiff no.2 and substituting the name of the executor of the last Will and Testament of Smt. Pushpa Devi Bangur.
Considered the prayer made by the counsel for the respective parties.
2
This Court finds that the executor can be substituted but since the other legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff no.2 are available, they should also be given an opportunity to be substituted in place of the plaintiff no.2 but the learned counsel for the plaintiff did not take any steps for substitution of the other legal heirs of the plaintiff no.2. As such the application filed by the plaintiff being GA/2/2023 is not maintainable. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
(KRISHNA RAO, J.) sp3