Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
(Mohammad Nazrul & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal on 7 September, 2016
Author: Dipankar Datta
Bench: Dipankar Datta
1 34 07.09.2016
rrc W. P. 18055 (W) of 2016 (Mohammad Nazrul & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) Mr. Chitta Ranjan Chakraborty Mr. Somnath Banerjee Mr. Sumanta Chakraborty ......For the petitioners Mr. Amitesh Banerjee Ms. Munmun Tewari ......For the State It is submitted by Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate for the petitioners that deficit court fees have been put in vide filing no. A-15786 dated 6th September, 2016. Therefore, the writ petition shall be maintainable at the instance of all the petitioners.
The petitioners applied for benefits under Indira Awas Yojana. Such applications not having been considered, this writ petition has been presented before this Bench. It has been brought to the notice of this Bench that the Indira Awas Yojana (Scheme) has been restructured into Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana-Gramin (PMAY-G) with effect from 1st April, 2016. It has not been shown to this Bench that applications for benefits under Indira Awas Yojana shall be treated as applications under PMAY-G. 2 In that view of the matter, the petitioners' earlier applications cannot be treated to be pending. This writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to apply under PMAY-G before the appropriate authority and if such applications are received, the appropriate authority shall proceed to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law.
There shall be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible.
( Dipankar Datta, J. )