Central Information Commission
Shriom Prakash vs Department Of Posts on 19 September, 2014
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building (Near Post Office)
Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
Tel: +91-11-26101592
File No. CIC/BS/A/2013/002172/6029
19 September 2014
Relevant Facts emerging from the Complaint:
Appellant : Mr. Om Prakash
S/o Shri Kundan Ram
Field Officer PLI- 32, Vill: Haqdarpur,
PO: Sherpur, District: Gurgaon
Via- Khalilpur - 122502
Respondent : CPIO & Dy. Divisional Manager (PLI)
Department of Posts
O/o the Chief Postmaster General
Haryana Circle, Ambala - 133001
RTI application filed on : 09/04/2013
PIO replied on : 25/04/2013
First appeal filed on : 06/05/2013
First Appellate Authority order : 13/06/2013
Second Appeal received on : 08/07/2013
Information sought:-
The appellant has sought the following information:-
"Non counting of PLI No. HY-CP-NM-10CS in the name of Ashish accepted on 21-05-2009 & HY- CP-NM-12 in the name of Sunny accepted on 31-08-2009"
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present Appellant: Mr. Om Prakash Respondent: Mr. Ram Murti Sharma CPIO's representative through TC: 09416067032 & Mr. Ashwani System Manager M: 09416447455 The CPIO's representative stated that the information requested by the appellant in his RTI application dated 09/04/2013, as available on record, was provided vide letter dated 25/04/2013 and the reply has been upheld by FAA vide order dated 13/06/2013. He further stated that the appellant's grievance has also been settled by releasing the additional incentive on 11/10/2013. The appellant stated that there are certain PLI policies for which the incentive has still not been paid. The CPIO's representative stated that if the appellant provides the details of the PLI policies his grievance will be examined.Page 1 of 2
Decision notice:
The information has been provided. However, as agreed by the CPIO's representative he should look into the appellant's grievance as soon as he submits the details of PLI policies for which incentive has not been paid and provide the information to him.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
BASANT SETH Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy:
(R. L. Gupta) Dy. Registrar/Designated Officer Page 2 of 2