Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

As Karta Of Gurdayal P Berlia Huf vs Om Prakash Berlia For Self And on 27 September, 2023

Author: I. P. Mukerji

Bench: I. P. Mukerji

   ORDER                                                 OD 49-51

             IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                     In appeal from its
           ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION



                      APO No. 113 of 2022
                               with
                        CS No. 12 of 2009
                 Vijay Kumar Berlia for Self and
                as Karta of Gurdayal P Berlia HUF
                             Versus
                 OM Prakash Berlia for Self and
               as Karta of Om Prakash Berlia HUF


                     APO No. 102 of 2022
                      IA No. GA 1 of 2022
                              with
                       CS No. 12 of 2009
                 Narendra Kumar Berlia & Ors.
                             Versus
                   Om Prakash Berlia & Ors.


                     APO No. 52 of 2022
                     Vijay Kumar Berlia
                           Versus
                   OM Prakash Berlia & Ors.




Before:
The Hon'ble Justice I. P. MUKERJI
             And
The Hon'ble Justice BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Date: 27th September 2023

                                                              Appearance:
                                      Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Advocate
                                      Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Sr. Advocate
                                     Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Advocate
                                                Mr. Pranit Bag, Advocate
                                          Mr. Vikram Wadehra, Advocate
                                             Mr. Raunak Bose, Advocate
                                              Mr. Mayukh Roy, Advocate
                                                     ... for the purchaser
                                          Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Sr. Advocate
                                        Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Advocate
                                      Mr. Sarvapriya Mukherjee, Advocate
                                                     Mr. Arif Ali, Advocate
                                              Mr. Arnab Sardar, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Ratul Das, Advocate
                                        for the appellant in APO 52/2022
                                               Mr. H. L. Tiku, Sr. Advocate
                                         Mr. Ahin Choudhury, Sr. Advocate
                                    for respondent no. 3 in APO 102/2022
2

Mr. Sagar Bandopadhyay, Advocate Mr. Lalit Baid, Advocate Mr. M. P. Sahay, Advocate Mr. Tamoghna Saha, Advocate Mr. Satyaki Mukherjee, Advocate Ms. Saberi Saha, Advocate Ms. Moumita Dhar, Advocate for the appellant in APO 52/2022 & respondent no. 3 in APO 102/2022 Mr. S. N. Mookherjee, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr. Advocate Mr. S. E. Huda, Advocate Mr. Varun Kedia, Advocate for respondent no. 3 in APO 52/2022 & respondent no. 15 in APO 102/2022 Mr. Sakya Sen, Advocate Mr. Shiv Ratan Kakrania, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2 in APO 52/2022 & APO 102/2022 Ms. Reshmi Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Soumya Sankar Chini, Advocate for respondent no. 9 in APO No. 102 of 2022 The Court:- Mr. Chidambaram, learned senior advocate appearing for the purchaser, Dhruva Woolen Mills Private Limited, concludes his argument, in the appeal (APO/113/2022). His advocate-on-record is at liberty to file written submissions after conclusion of hearing with the Assistant Registrar attached to this Court.

Let these appeals retain their position in the list for further argument.

(I. P. MUKERJI, J.) (BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.) S.Kumar