Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi

Dcm Engineering Products vs Commissioner Of Customs on 7 March, 2003

Equivalent citations: 2003(155)ELT612(TRI-DEL)

ORDER

K.K. Usha, J. (President)

1. This is an appeal at the instance of the importer against order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) dt. 7-6-02. The order-in-original dt. 19-2-1999 was challenged before the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was dismissed on the ground that it was barred by limitation. The appellant contended that since the order 19-2-99 is the first speaking order received by it, there is no merit in the view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals) that the appeal filed before him was barred by limitation.

2. We had occasion to consider a similar matter in our Final Order No. 642/02-A in Appeal No. C/489/02/A. In the above order, we have taken the view that since the Assessing Authority have passed an order on the request made by the appellant and it was mentioned therein that an appeal would lie against that order before the Commissioner (Appeals) within three months from the date of the communication, the Commissioner (Appeals) could not have dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay. We follow the above view in this case also.

3. We, therefore, set aside the order impugned and remand the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for being considered on merits after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellants.

4. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.