Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Ankita Kumari vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 2 April, 2026

02.04.2026
Sl. No.9
 Ct. No.14
  ss
                       IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
                               APPELLATE SIDE
                              W.P.A. No. 4406 of 2026
                                  Ankita Kumari
                                       Versus
                          The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                  Mr. Rudranil De
                  Mr. Gourav Das
                  Mr. Soumo Charan
                                                  ...for the Petitioner
                  Mr. Pritam Choudhury
                                ... for the DPSC, Paschim Bardhaman
                  Mr. Manoj Kr. Mondal
                                                    ... for the State

             1.   Report furnished by the Chairman, District Primary

                  School Council, Paschim Bardhaman dated 1st April,

                  2026 is taken on record.

             2.   By the present writ petition the petitioner seeks for

                  setting aside and/or quashing of the order of

                  transfer issued by the Chairman, District Primary

                  School Council, Paschim Bardhaman, under Memo

                  no. 251/DPSC/PSB/26 dated 17th February, 2026

                  being Annexure P2 to the writ petition.

             3.   The petitioner contends that she joined as an

                  Assistant Teacher in Kasturba Gandhi Junior Basic

                  School, P.O. Chittaranjan under Chittaranjan Circle

                  in the District of Burdwan on 6th February, 2017.

                  The petitioner has been approved in service. By the

                  impugned order dated 17th February, 2026, the

                  petitioner has been transferred from Kasturba

                  Gandhi Junior Basic School to D.V.C. Left Bank

                  (Unit-I) F.P. School under the same Circle. As on
                          2




     19th December 2025 the school where the petitioner

     is presently posted had 'surplus' teacher whereas

     the school to which the petitioner is transferred had

     'deficit' teacher. Be that as it may, the petitioner is

     not a surplus teacher in view of the provisions of the

     Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education

     Act, 2009 (in short, 'RTE Act, 2009). Hence, this writ

     petition.

4.   Mr. Rudranil De, learned Advocate appearing on

     behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is

     not a surplus teacher in the present school.

     Referring to the report furnished by the State

     respondents he submits that as per the existing

situation, in the event the transfer order of the petitioner is given effect to there would be a surplus teacher in the school where the petitioner has been directed to join and a deficit would arise in the present school of the petitioner. Thus, the aspect needs to be revisited by the concerned DPSC. He seeks for setting aside of the impugned transfer order and allow the petitioner to continue in her present place of posting.

5. Mr. Pritam Choudhury, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the District Primary School Council, Paschim Bardhaman concedes to the aforesaid submissions and indicates that the impugned transfer order may be revisited taking into consideration the present situation in the concerned schools regarding Pupil Teacher Ratio (PTR). 3

6. As per amended provisions of Rule 3 of West Bengal Primary Education (Transfer of Teachers including Head Teacher) Rules, 2002 each Council shall maintain the required numbers of teachers in each school as per provisions specified in the Schedule of the RTE Act, 2009.

7. In order to consider the submissions advanced on behalf of the learned Advocates for the respective parties, it would be profitable to reproduce the norms and standards of a school in the Schedule of RTE Act, 2009 as hereunder:

" Sl.No.          Item                 Norms and Standards

1.          Numbers of teachers:
(a)        For first Class to          Admitted children Number of teachers
fifth Class                   Up to Sixty              Two
                          Between sixty-one to
                          Ninety                       Three
                         Between Ninety-one to
                         one hundred and twenty        Four
                         Between One hundred
                         and twenty-one to two
                         hundred                       Five
                        Above One hundred and
                        fifty children          Five plus one Head-
                                                teacher
                     Above Two hundred
                     Children                  Pupil-Teacher Ratio
                                          (excluding Head-teacher)
                                          Shall not exceed forty."


8. As per the aforesaid Schedule, in the event the number of students in a school is between ninety- one and one hundred twenty, the number of teacher has to be four and in the event the number of students is between one hundred and twenty-one to two hundred, the number of teachers has to be five.

9. As per the report furnished by the Chairman, District Primary School Council, Paschim Bardhaman, the D.V.C. Left Bank (Unit-I) F.P. School is presently running with total five teachers 4 and the number of pupil is 133 meaning thereby that it has requisite number of teachers as required under norms and standards. In the event the transfer order is given effect the number of teachers will increase to six and the said school will have surplus teachers. In the school where the petitioner is presently posted, i.e., Kasturba Gandhi Junior Basic School, the number of students is 95 and the total number of teachers is four which also is in consonance with the norms and standards. Again, if the petitioner is transferred to D.V.C. Left Bank (Unit-I) F.P. School, the school where the petitioner is presently posted will have a deficit.

10. Bearing in mind the above circumstances, the impugned transfer order issued by the Chairman, District Primary School Council, Pachim Bardhaman dated 17th February, 2026 is accordingly, set aside.

11. Respondent no.3, District Primary School Council, Paschim Bardhaman is directed to revisit the decision of transferring the petitioner from Kasturba Gandhi Junior Basic School, P.O. Chittaranjan under Chittaranjan Circle, District Burdwan to the D.V.C. Left Bank (Unit-I) F.P. School, within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order.

12. The petitioner will be allowed to continue in her present school, i.e. Kasturba Gandhi Junior Basic School till such decision is taken by the District Primary School Council, Paschim Bardhaman. 5

13. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the concerned respondents for necessary compliance.

14. With the above direction, the writ petition being WPA 4406 of 2026 stands disposed of.

15. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted.

16. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

17. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of.

18. There shall be no order as to costs.

19. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

20. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)