Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Narayan @ Lambu Tarini vs State Of Odisha .... Opp. Party on 22 September, 2023

Author: S.K. Sahoo

Bench: S.K. Sahoo

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                           BLAPL No.2335 of 2022

              Narayan @ Lambu Tarini                 ....       Petitioner

                                    Mr. Ashok Das, Advocate

                                          -versus-

              State of Odisha                        ....      Opp. Party

                                    Mr. Manoranjan Mishra
                                    Addl. Standing Counsel
                                   CORAM:
                              JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                                      ORDER
Order No.                           22.09.2023

   07.             This   matter     is    taken     up    through    Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

This is an application for bail under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Aska P.S. Case No. 231 of 2017 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 60 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Aska for alleged commission of offences under sections 302,120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-B)(a)/27 of the Arms Act.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Aska by order dated 05.03.2022.

// 2 // In view of availability of thirty six criminal antecedents against the petitioner as submitted by the learned counsel for the State, while not inclining to release the petitioner on bail, but taking into account the period of detention of the petitioner in judicial custody since 14.11.2019 and further submission that only eight witnesses have been examined out of forty eight charge sheet witnesses, I direct the learned trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same by the end of December 2023 resorting to the provision under section 309 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within the said period.

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Copy of the order be communicated to the learned trial Court forthwith.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge PKSahoo Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: PRAMOD KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 25-Sep-2023 14:08:54 Page 2 of 2