Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Dhan Vati@Dhanno vs Satish Kumar on 2 February, 2023

Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva

Bench: Sanjeev Sachdeva

                          $~13
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +    MAT.APP.(F.C.) 8/2022 & CM APPLs. 4522-23/2022
                               DHAN VATI@DHANNO                           ..... Appellant
                                               Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate.
                                               versus
                               SATISH KUMAR                               ..... Respondent
                                               Through: Mr. Sudhir Tewatia, Mr. Hemant
                                                          Kapoor and Mr. Sahil Gandhi,
                                                          Advocates.
                               CORAM:
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
                                               ORDER

% 02.02.2023

1. Reply stated to have been filed by the respondent is not on record. Let the counsel check up with the Registry and have the same placed on record.

2. Digital copy of the Family Court record be requisitioned.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the maintenance amount as directed by the Family Court has not been paid since October, 2022. This is disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent who submits that payments up to January, 2023 have already been cleared.

4. Respondent shall furnish the details of payments made to the appellant. In case, there are any arrears, the same be cleared within one week.

5. Parties shall also file their respective income affidavits in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Rajnesh V. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324 within four weeks.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEEPAK SINGH MAT.APP.(F.C.) 8/2022 Page 1 of 2 Signing Date:04.02.2023 15:58:44

6. Learned counsel for the respondent further submits that appellant is failing to appear in the other proceedings initiated by the appellant as well as by the respondent.

7. Mr. Rathi, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not representing the appellant in other proceedings, however, in case information is provided of those cases, he shall communicate to the appellant to properly prosecute/defend those proceedings.

8. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the details shall be forwarded to Mr. Rathi within two days.

9. List for consideration on 17.04.2023.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J VIKAS MAHAJAN, J FEBRUARY 2, 2023/dss Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEEPAK SINGH MAT.APP.(F.C.) 8/2022 Page 2 of 2 Signing Date:04.02.2023 15:58:44