Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Jasharam Umedram Sataram Benival vs State Of Gujarat on 19 February, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel

Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel

                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/4199/2026                                 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2026

                                                                                                            undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 4199 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                                          JASHARAM UMEDRAM SATARAM BENIVAL
                                                        Versus
                                                  STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR DK CHAUDHARI(5361) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                          Date : 19/02/2026
                                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. D.K. Chaudhari appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Niraj Sharma appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11206033250748 of 2025 registered with Unjha Police Station, District Mehsana, for the offence punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Sections 338, 339 and 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Page 1 of 5 Uploaded by BHUPENDRASINH SONAGRA(HC01082) on Fri Feb 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 14 03:51:15 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/4199/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2026 undefined

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that since the charge-sheet is filed, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-

i. While allegation against the applicant being that he was a driver of the vehicle from which the contraband-liquor had been recovered, yet, it would appear that the applicant was neither the owner of the contraband-liquor nor the ultimate recipient of the same. Page 2 of 5 Uploaded by BHUPENDRASINH SONAGRA(HC01082) on Fri Feb 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 14 03:51:15 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/4199/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2026 undefined ii. The fact of the applicant not having any antecedent. iii. Apprehension of the learned APP that the applicant is not being resident of the State of Gujarat, if released, he may abscond, could be allayed by imposing suitable conditions. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11206033250748 of 2025 registered with Unjha Police Station, District Mehsana, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; Page 3 of 5 Uploaded by BHUPENDRASINH SONAGRA(HC01082) on Fri Feb 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 14 03:51:15 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/4199/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2026 undefined [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; [d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the proposed address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior intimation to the I.O.; [f] mark presence once a month for a period of six months before the concerned police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant Page 4 of 5 Uploaded by BHUPENDRASINH SONAGRA(HC01082) on Fri Feb 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 14 03:51:15 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/4199/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/02/2026 undefined for being released on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) BDSONGARA Page 5 of 5 Uploaded by BHUPENDRASINH SONAGRA(HC01082) on Fri Feb 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 14 03:51:15 IST 2026