Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Peiner Smag Machinery (India) Private ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Customs on 6 January, 2023

Author: M.Sundar

Bench: M.Sundar

                                                                       W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATE: 06.01.2023

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

                                                   W.P.No.34283 of 2022



                     PEINER SMAG MACHINERY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
                     Represented by its Director
                     Krishnamurti Chidambaram
                     Plot No.A-24 Engineering SEZ
                     SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Phase-III
                     Ranipet – Ponnai Road (SH 124A)
                     Ranipet – 632 405                    ... Petitioner


                                                     Vs.
                     Assistant Commissioner of Customs
                     4th Floor, IGST Refund Section
                     Chennai Commissionerate
                     Custom House, Chennai – 600 001                      ... Respondents

                                  Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to
                     dispose of the petitioner representation dated 01.06.2019 for refund of
                     IGST amount in a time bound manner.


                                  For Petitioner       : Mr.N.Murali

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/8
                                                                               W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch

                                      For Respondents       : Mr.J.Vasu
                                                             Junior Panel Counsel (CBIT and Customs)

                                                             ORDER

This order will now dispose of the captioned writ petition.

2. Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel for sole writ petitioner and Mr.J.Vasu, learned Junior Panel Counsel (CBIT and Customs) on behalf of lone respondent are before this Court.

3. Owing to the short point on which the captioned writ petition turns, main writ petition was taken up with the consent of learned counsel on both sides.

4. This order has to be read in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made by this Court in the listing on 22.12.2022, which reads as follows:

'The simple point in captioned writ petition is, a refund application dated 01.06.2019 (filed on 10.06.2019) under Section 54 of 'The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017' [hereinafter 'C-G&ST Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity] is pending from 2019 is learned counsel's say.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to serve https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/8 W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch on the learned Standing counsel for sole respondent.
3. Registry to show the name of learned State counsel in the next listing.
4. List after Christmas Vacation. List on 04.01.2023.' \
5. Learned counsel for writ petitioner adverting to the refund application dated 01.06.2019 submits that the petitioner-company is engaged in the business of manufacturing of rope grabs, motor grabs and other variants of grabs including hydraulic grabs and most of the finished goods are exported. It was further submitted by learned counsel that with the advent of the GST regime, the writ petitioner opted 'Integrated Goods and Services Tax' [I-G & ST] vide Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as they did not have Letter of Undertaking and the refund sought for is qua zero rated sales made to overseas purchases (exports).

It may not be necessary to delve into facts further owing to the simple prayer that is innocuous.

6. It will suffice to say that the aforementioned refund application dated 01.06.2019 was followed by as many as four reminders dated 19.07.2019, 29.07.2019, 05.12.2019 and 31.10.2022. It is rather intriguing that a simple refund application under Section 54 'Central https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/8 W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017' ['C- G & ST Act' for the sake of brevity and convenience] has been kept pending for such length of time.

7. Be that as it may, captioned writ petition is disposed of with a directive to the sole respondent to consider, process and make orders in the refund application of writ petitioner dated 01.06.2019 as expeditiously as the business of the sole respondent would permit and in any event within four weeks from today i.e., on or before 10.02.2023.

8. Before concluding this Court deems it appropriate to scan and reproduce the refund application that has been placed before this Court. A scanned reproduction of the refund application dated 01.06.2019 is as follows:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/8 W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/8 W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch
9. The decision on the refund application shall be indicated to the writ petitioner under due acknowledgement within five workings days from the date of the decision.

Captioned writ petition disposed of in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.

06.01.2023 Index: yes/no Speaking / Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes / No gpa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/8 W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch To Assistant Commissioner of Customs 4th Floor, IGST Refund Section Chennai Commissionerate Custom House, Chennai – 600 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 7/8 W.P.Nos.33401 of 2022 etc., batch M.SUNDAR, J., gpa W.P.No.34283 of 2022 06.01.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 8/8