Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Avinash S/O. Devidas Dipake And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 October, 2019

Author: V.K.Jadhav

Bench: V.K.Jadhav

                                         1            909-ABA.1309-19.odt

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

          909 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1309 OF 2019

                        1. AVINASH S/O. DEVIDAS DIPAKE
                         2. MILIND S/O. DEVIDAS DIPAKE
                                    VERSUS
                         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

                                   ...
     Mr. Patil Hanmant V., Advocate for Applicants
     Mr. K.D.Munde APP for Respondent-State
                                   ...


                                   CORAM :     V.K.JADHAV, J.
                                   DATE :      15.10.2019

     PER COURT :-

     1.      The      applicants   are   seeking   anticipatory        bail     in

     connection with Crime No.335 of 2019 registered with Hingoli

     (Rural) Police Station, District Hingoli for the offences

     punishable under sections 376(D), 384, 323, 506 of the Indian

     Penal Code.          Their application with similar prayer bearing

     Criminal Bail Application No.274 of 2019 came to be rejected

     by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.

     2.      The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the

     informant has made certain allegations against applicant No.1

     about commission of rape, however, the allegations are vague




::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019                       ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 00:37:24 :::
                                       2            909-ABA.1309-19.odt

     in nature.       It has alleged in the complaint that in the year

     2015, applicant No.1 had performed the forcible intercourse

     with her against her will and even prepared her video in a

     compromising position. Even applicant No.1 had given threats

     to her on the point of said video. It has been alleged that right

     from the year 2015, the informant stayed at various places

     with applicant No.1 and even also in a rented room.                  The

     learned counsel for the applicants submits that it has been

     further stated in the complaint that the informant had

     developed the relations with one Pawan Kanade and thereafter

     both the applicants have given threats to her on point of

     recording of previous video in a compromising position and

     extracted certain amount from her. It has further alleged that

     both of them have performed sexual intercourse with her

     forcibly against her will. The learned counsel submits that the

     allegations are unbelievable and even though the incident as

     alleged in the complaint is right from the year 2015 till 2018

     the complaint to be lodged belatedly without explaining such

     an inordinate delay caused in lodging the complaint.                 The

     learned counsel for the applicants submits that apart from this,

     in the year 2018 itself, the same informant has lodged the




::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019                    ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 00:37:24 :::
                                     3            909-ABA.1309-19.odt

     complaint at Police Station Kotwali, District Parbhani against

     the said Pawan Kanade and on the basis of her complaint,

     Crime No.56 of 2018 under Section 376 of IPC came to be

     registered with Police Station Kotwali, District Parbhani. The

     learned counsel submits that in the said complaint, the

     informant has referred the present applicant No.1 as her

     husband. The learned counsel submits that the informant had

     taken two different stands and made allegations about the

     commission of rape against the said Pawan Kanade, in the year

     2018 and thereafter also against present applicant No.1 to

     whom she has referred her husband, for commission of rape.

     The learned counsel submits that the antecedents of applicants

     are clear. Applicant No.1 is a student and he has completed his

     B.Tech. and applicant No.2 is the Branch Manager of Syndicate

     Bank posted in the State of Andhra Pradesh at Present. Their

     antecedents are clear. They may be released on anticipatory

     bail.

     3.      The learned APP has strongly resisted the application on

     the ground that the allegations are serious in nature. Both the

     applicants have performed sexual intercourse with informant

     forcibly against her will. Applicant No.1 has developed the




::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019                  ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 00:37:24 :::
                                         4           909-ABA.1309-19.odt

     sexual relations with the informant with some ulterior motive

     and recorded her video in a compromising position. Applicant

     No.1 had thereafter started blackmailing the informant on the

     basis of the said video and even extracted the amount from her

     on many times. Even applicant No.2, who happened to be the

     real brother of applicant No.1 has also given threats to

     informant and performed the sexual intercourse with her

     against her will. Prima facie there is a strong case against both

     the applicants. Their custodial interrogation is required to find

     out the truth.            The applicants may not be released on

     anticipatory bail.

     4.      On going through the allegations made in the complaint

     and on perusal of the investigation papers, particularly the

     annexures of this application, it appears that though the

     informant has made certain allegations against applicant No.1

     Avinash about the commission of rape, however, in the earlier

     complaint of the year 2018 at Kotwali Police Station, District

     Parbhani lodged against one Pawan Kanade under Section 376

     of the IPC, the informant has referred the present applicant

     No.1 Avinash as her husband and further given the date of her

     marriage with him as on 22.10.2015.           On the basis of the




::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019                     ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 00:37:24 :::
                                         5              909-ABA.1309-19.odt

     complaint filed by the present informant, Crime No.56 of 2018

     came to be registered in Kotwali Police Station, District

     Parbhani.        So far as the present crime is concerned, the

     informant has taken altogether a different stand and made the

     allegations against applicant No.1 in the manner that she is not

     at all related to him. It further appears from the investigation

     papers particularly the statement of the landlord, where the

     informant stayed along with applicant No.1 in a rented room,

     it appears that the informant herself told the landlord that

     applicant No.1 Avinash is her husband. Thus, considering the

     entire aspect of the case and since the antecedents of both the

     applicants are clear, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

     the applicants.           Applicant No.1 is student and he has

     completed his B.Tech., so far as applicant No.2 is concerned, he

     is serving as a Branch Manager in Syndicate Bank.                    Hence,

     following order :

                                   ORDER

1. The application is hereby allowed.

2. In the event of the arrest of the applicant No.1.

AVINASH S/O. DEVIDAS DIPAKE and applicant No.2. MILIND S/O. DEVIDAS DIPAKE in connection with Crime No.335 of 2019 registered ::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 00:37:24 ::: 6 909-ABA.1309-19.odt with Hingoli (Rural) Police Station, District Hingoli for the offences punishable under sections 376(D), 384, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, they be released on bail on furnishing P.B. of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) each, with one surety of the like amount by each of them, on the following conditions :-

a] The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
b] The applicants shall attend the concerned police station as and when required by the Investigating Officer for carrying out further investigation into the crime, if any.
c] The applicants shall not make any attempt to meet or communicate with the informant in any manner till disposal of the case.
3. Application is accordingly disposed off.

(V.K.JADHAV, J.) ...

vmk/-

::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 18/10/2019 00:37:24 :::