Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Chattisgarh High Court

Amisha In Sky Creation Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Chhattisgarh 15 Cont/71/2018 ... on 7 February, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                   1

                                                                                     NAFR

                        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                    Writ Petition (C) No. 334 of 2018

                   Amisha In Sky Creation Pvt. Ltd., Through Director Akhilesh Agrawal, Aged
                   About 53 Years, S/o Late R.L. Agrawal, R/o Awanti Vihar, Raipur
                   Chhattisgarh.                                             ---- Petitioner

                                                Versus

                1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Housing And
                   Environment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Post And PS Mandir Hasaud,
                   Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

                2. Raipur Development Authority, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Second
                   Floor, Bhakt Matakarma Commercial Complex, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur
                   Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh       ---- Respondents

For Petitioners : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. For State : Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/02/18 Heard.

2. Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2- Raipur Development Authority, relying upon the order of this Court dated 13.10.2017 passed in WPC No. 2655 of 2016, would submit that the present case is identical to that of WPC No. 2655 of 2016 and final allotment letter will be issued to the petitioners within one year from today.

3. The aforesaid statement is taken on record.

4. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the respondent, the writ petition is disposed of. No cost(s).

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka