Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 2]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gaurav Sharma @ Ricky Lahoria vs State Of Punjab on 10 July, 2020

Author: Ritu Bahri

Bench: Ritu Bahri

Crl. Misc. No. M-16393of 2020                                                   -1-

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

                                Crl. Misc. No. M-16393of 2020
                                Date of decision :- 10.07.2020

Gaurav Sharma @ Ricky Lahoria                                         ...Petitioner

                                     versus
State of Punjab                                                     ...Respondents

CORAM:         HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:       Mr. Vikasdeep Singh, Advocate
               for the petitioner

               Mr. M.S. Daulat, Addl..A.G Punjab

               Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate
               for the complainant.

               ****

RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.61 dated 21.03.2020, registered at Police Station Sultanpur Lodhi, District Kapurthala, who has been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Section 376/420/354-D/506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner is that on the pretext of marriage, he made physical relations with the complainant but the fact is that the complainant knew from the beginning that the petitioner is married and is also having a child. Learned counsel while referring to the contents of the F.I.R mentioned at page No. 4 of the paper book submits that the F.I.R has been registered as there was dispute going on between the petitioner and his brother. Learned 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11-07-2020 00:02:39 ::: Crl. Misc. No. M-16393of 2020 -2- counsel for the petitioner states that now the matter has been duly compromised between the parties on 06.07.2020.

Learned counsel for the complainant has not denied the factum of compromise effected between the parties on 06.07.2020. The compromise deed is taken on record as Annexure A-1.

Learned State counsel states that the medial report of the prosecutrix is still awaited. The challan was presented in March, 2020.

Heard.

Petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2020.

Keeping in view the fact that the trial is likely to take some time to conclude and the fact that the matter has been duly compromised between the parties, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail during pendency of the trial of the present case, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Kapurthala.



10.07.2020                                           (RITU BAHRI)
G Arora                                                 JUDGE

               Whether speaking/reasoned                 Yes
               Whether reportable                        No




                                         2 of 2
                      ::: Downloaded on - 11-07-2020 00:02:40 :::