Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Nouchad Ali Alias Nousad Ali vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 18 September, 2025

                                                                          Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010171602025




                                                                   undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                               Case No. : Bail Appln./2556/2025

            NOUCHAD ALI ALIAS NOUSAD ALI
            SON OF ANJAD ALI SHEIKH
            R/O VILL- NARAYANPUR
            P.O. AN DP.S. AMGURI, DIST. CHIRANG, ASSAM-783393



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
            REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM

            2:NABAKANTA B ASUMATARY
             S/OLT. HITESWAR BASUMATARY
            R/O VILL- 4 NO. KAWOIMARI BLOCK
             P.O. AND P.S. SARTHEBARI

            DIST. BARPETA
            ASSAM
            PIN-78130

Advocate for the Petitioner   : K U AHMED,

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR H GUPTA (R-2),MR Y. BARBHUIYA (R-2)
                                                                       Page No.# 2/2




                                   BEFORE
               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
                                    ORDER

18.09.2025 Heard Mr. K U Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for granting regular bail to the accused person/petitioner, namely, Nouchad Ali @ Nausad Ali, who was arrested on 12/02/2025 in connection with Sarthebari PS Case No. 17/2025 (Special POCSO Case No. 16/2025) under Section 140(3) of BNS read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

Scanned copy of TCR has been received and on perusal of the same, it appears that the victim girl was 16 years of age at the time of occurrence and there are grave incriminating materials against the accused.

Considering the gravity of offences, the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant