Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

S.I. Kuldeep Singh vs Commissioner Of Delhi Police on 23 January, 2015

      

  

   

 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH

O.A. No. 302/2015
M.A. No.224/2015

New Delhi, this the 23rd day of January, 2015.

HONBLE MR. V.  AJAY KUMAR, MEMBER (J)
HONBLE MR. P.K. BASU, MEMBER (A)

1.	S.I. Kuldeep Singh, Aged about 48 years
	S/o Late Sh. Jai Singh
	R/o H-84, Shakarpur Colony, Delhi-92
	Belt No.	: D-2145
	Posted at	: 12 Bn. DAP

2.	H.C. Dalip Singh, Aged about 44 years
	S/o Late Sh. Jai Dayal Singh
	R/o O-8, Police Colony
	Model Town-II, Delhi
	Belt No.	: 98/L
	Posted at	: DCP P&L

3.	H.C. Sansar Pal, Aged about 59 Years
	S/o Shri Vijay Pal Singh
	R/o D-5/812, Raj Nagar
	Loni Boarder,
	Ghaziabad (UP)
	Belt No.	: 6750 DAP
	Posted at	: 12 Bn. 

4.	H.C. Chhote Lal, Aged about 59 years
	S/o late Sh. Budh Singh
	R/o A-94, IInd Floor , Gali No.5
	Old Govind Pura Extn.
	Delhi-51
	Belt No.	: 6751
	Posted at	: 12 Bn. DAP

5.	Constable Sushil Kumar, Aged about 51 years
	S/o Late Sh. Raghuveer Sharan
	R/o A-70, Uttaranchal Vihar Society,
	Bhatal, Loni Ghaziabad, UP
	Belt No.	: 13229
	Posted at	: 12 Bn. DAP

6.	Constable Ramesh, Aged about 45 years
	S/o Sh. Sehdev Singh
	R/o B-10/244, Brijpuri
	Delhi-94
	Belt No.	: 13228
	Posted at	: 12 Bn. DAP

7.	Constable Avnesh, Aged about 45 years
	S/o Sh. Dharampal Singh,
	R/o H-49, Block-B , Gali No. 20
	Kaushik Enclave, Burari, Delhi
	Belt No.	: 13231
	Posted at	: 12 Bn. DAP

8.	Constable Neeraj Kumar, Aged about 47 years
	S/o Late Shri. Rajpal Sharma,
	R/o M-60, Naveen Shahdara
	Delhi-32
	Belt No.	: 1678 NE
	Posted at	: North East Distt.

9.	Constable Anand Prakash, Aged about 58 years
	S/o Late Sh. Daya Nand
	R/o H. No. 105, Gali No.7
	Devi Nagar, Karawal Nagar, Delhi-94.
	Belt No.	: 2823 NE
	Posted at	: North East Distt. 

10.	H.C.Uday Veer, Aged about 52 Years
	S/o Late Sh. Balbir Singh
	R/o 3174, Gali No. 80, Apex Road,
	Sant Nagar, Burari, Delhi-84
	Belt No.	: 905 Security
	Posted at	: Security 					..Applicants

(By Advocate: Shri M.K. Bhardwaj)
Versus

1.	Commissioner of Delhi Police
	Police Hq, I.P. Estate
	New Delhi.

2.	Deputy Commissioner of Police
	Provisioning and Logistic
	Old Police Line, Delhi.

3.	Deputy Commissioner of Police
	12 Bn., Kingsway Camp, Delhi.

4.	Deputy Commissioner of Police
	North East Distt.
	Dilshad Garden, Delhi

5.	Deputy Commission of Police
	Security, Delhi.                                   .. Respondents

ORDER (ORAL)

By Mr. V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) Heard the learned counsel for the applicants.

2. M.A. 224/2015, filed under Rule 4(5)(a) of C.A.T. (Procedure) Rules, 1987 for joining together, is allowed.

3. The applicants, who are working as Constable/Head Constables and S.I. in the respondents-Delhi Police, filed the present O.A., seeking the following relief:

(a) Direct the respondents to release annual increments to the applicants for the suspension period and accordingly fix the pay of applicants.
(b) Declare the action of the respondents in not releasing increment to the applicants for suspension period as illegal and issue appropriate directions for refixing the pay of applicants by taking into account increments for suspension period and paying arrears with 9% interest.
(c) Award costs of the proceedings and
(d) Pass any other order/direction which this Honble Tribunal deems fit and proper in favour of the applicant and against the respondents in the facts and circumstances of the case.

4. It is submitted that in the identical circumstances, this Tribunal allowed the O.A. No.3042/2013 filed by the similarly situated persons vide Annexure A-6, judgment dated 07.05.2014, and the respondents have also implemented the same vide Annexure A-1, dated 19.11.2014. However, when the applicants made representations seeking extension of the same benefits to the applicants also, as they are also similarly placed to the applicants in the aforesaid O.A., the respondents have not passed any orders thereon till date.

5. In the circumstances, the O.A. is disposed of at the admission stage, without going into the other merits of the case, by directing the respondents to consider the representations of the applicants vide Annexure A-3 (Colly.) and to pass appropriate speaking and reasoned orders thereon, in the light of the order of this Tribunal in O.A. No.3042/2013 dated 07.05.2014, within 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

(P.K. BASU) 				  		(V.  AJAY KUMAR)   
Member (A)			  			      Member (J)

/Jyoti/