Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Ram Gopal Yadav vs Shailesh Yadav And Another on 6 January, 2026





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC-LKO:522
 

 
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
LUCKNOW 
 
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7361 of 2025   
 
   Ram Gopal Yadav    
 
  .....Petitioner(s)   
 
 Versus  
 
   Shailesh Yadav And Another    
 
  .....Respondent(s)       
 
   
 
  
 
Counsel for Petitioner(s)   
 
:   
 
Shantanu Sharma, Anshuman Sharma, Athar Ali, Nidhi Singh Rathour   
 
  
 
Counsel for Respondent(s)   
 
:  
 
  
 
     
 
 Court No. - 17
 
   
 
 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.     

1. Heard Sri Athar Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division Hawali, Lucknow to decide the Misc. Case No.870 of 2024 : Ram Gopal Yadav and another Vs. Shailesh Yadav and another expeditiously.

3. As the entire array of parties before the learned trial court is not available before this court, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to not press the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.

5. Let the certified copy of orders be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record.

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) January 6, 2026 Ram.