Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai
Dcit, Coimbatore vs M/S Texmo Industries, Coimbatore on 18 August, 2022
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, 'सी' यायपीठ, चे ई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
'C' BENCH: CHENNAI
ी महावीर िसंह, उपा , एवं
डॉ। दीपक पी. रपोटे , लेखा सद के सम
BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND
DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.515 & 516/Chny/2022
िनधा रणवष /Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2015-16
The Dy. Commissioner of- v. M/s.Texmo Industries,
Income Tax, Post Box No.5803,
Central Circle-1, Mettupalayam Road,
Income Tax Office, G.N.Mill Post,
67, Race Course Road, Coimbatore-29.
Coimbatore.
[PAN:AABFT 1899 B]
(अपीलाथ /Appellant) ( यथ /Respondent)
Department by : Mr.HemaBhupal, JCIT
Assessee by : Mr.K. Vignesh, Adv.
सुनवाईक तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18.08.2022
घोषणाक तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 18.08.2022
आदेश / O R D E R
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, Chennai, dated 30.03.2022 and pertains to assessment years 2012-13 &2015-16.
2. At the time of hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the tax effect in these appeals filed by the Revenue is less than the monetary limit of ₹50,00,000/- fixed by the CBDT to file appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal as per the CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019. The ld. DR fairly conceded the submissions made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee. Being so, the Revenue authorities are ITA Nos.515 & 516/Chny/2022 for AYs 2012-13 & 2015-16 M/s.Texmo Industries :: 2 ::
precluded from filing the appeals before the Tribunal, since the tax effect is less than ₹50,00,000/- in these appeals and the appeals filed by the Revenue are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed. However, the Department is at liberty to seek recall of the above, if it is found by the department that the said appeals are covered by exceptions given in Claue-10 of Instruction No.3 of 2018 issued by CBDT.
3. As per the ground No.2.2, it is observed that there is no audit objection for AYs 2012-13 & 2015-16. However, it is mentioned that there was an audit objection for AY 2011-12. Since, there was no audit objection for AYs 2012-13 & 2015-16, we are of the opinion that the case is not covered by Clause-10(c) of the Instruction No.3 of 2018.
4. In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced on the 18th day of August, 2022, in Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/-
(महावीरिसंह) (डॉ। दीपक पी. रपोटे )
(MAHAVIR SINGH) (DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE)
उपा /VICE PRESIDENT लेखासद य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
चे ई/Chennai,
!दनांक/Dated: 18th August, 2022.
TLN
आदेशक ितिलिपअ&ेिषत/Copy to:
1. अपीलाथ /Appellant 4. आयकरआयु'/CIT
2. यथ /Respondent 5. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR
3. आयकरआयु' (अपील)/CIT(A) 6. गाड फाईल/GF