Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Saraswati Saw vs State Of Chhattisgarh 51 Wpc/2225/2018 ... on 7 January, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                      1

                                                                       NAFR

          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                          WPS No. 8094 of 2018

   1. Smt. Saraswati Saw W/o Late Dhananjay Saw Aged About 65 Years
      Retired Upper Division Teacher, Thakkar Baba Adiwasi Kanya
      Ashram Orchha, District - Narayanpur, Presently Residence At
      Dindayal Colony Q.No.15 Narayanpur, District - Narayanpur
      Chhattisgarh.

   2. Thanwarin Kaiwart D/o Samal Ram Kaiwart Aged About 66 Years
      Retired Hostel Superintendent Balak Ashram Sandra, District -
      Bijapur, Presently Residence At Ward No. 9, Q.No.132 Rajeev Chowk
      Narayanpur, District - Narayanpur Chhattisgarh.

                                                               ---- Petitioner

                                  Versus

   1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School
      Education, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District -
      Raipur Chhattisgarh.

   2. The Commissioner Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Development,
      Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

   3. The Director Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur,
      District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

   4. District Education Officer District - Narayanpur Chhattisgarh.

   5. District Education Officer District Bijapur, Chhattisgarh.

   6. Mata Rukmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti Through - Its Secretary, Mata
      Rukmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimarpal Tahsil And District,
      Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh.

                                                             ---- Respondent



For Petitioners                  None for the petitioners.
For Respondent/State             Ms Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer


                             Order On Board

                                     By

                       Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

2 07/01/2019

1) The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. No one appears for the petitioner even in the second call.

2) In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the Court, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.

3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-


                                                         Judge
Gowri                                            Prashant Kumar Mishra