Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Allahabad High Court

Munna Sokha @ Heera Lal vs State Of U.P on 9 July, 2010

Author: Shashi Kant Gupta

Bench: Shashi Kant Gupta

Court No. - 51

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17507 of 2010
Petitioner :- Munna Sokha @ Heera Lal
Respondent :- State Of U.P
Petitioner Counsel :- Chandra Prakash Mishra
Respondent Counsel :- Govt Advocate
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the prosecutrix is a married lady and, as per the medical report, no definite opinion about rape has been given by the Doctor.He further submits that no injury, either external or on the private parts of the prosecutrix, was found. He further submits that absolutely an improbable and absurd story has been set up by the prosecution . Referring to para 11 of the affidavit filed, in support of the affidavit, he further submits that the applicant is 60% handicapped and the complainant , who happens to be the brother in law of the prosecutrix, wanted to take loan in the name of the applicant and when he refused to do so, was falsely implicated, concocting a false and fictitious story . He further submits that since there are materials contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. , no reliance is liable to be placed upon the same.He further submits that the applicant has got no criminal history to his credit and there is no chance of his fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the prosecution evidence, and is in jail since 2.4.2010.

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

Let the applicant Munna Sokha alias Heera Lal involved in Case Crime No. 161 of 2010 under Sections 376,506 I.P.C., P.S. Nebua Naurangia, District Kushinagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurise/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.

In case of breach of any of the above conditions , the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

Order Date :- 9.7.2010 MLK