Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Unknown vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By on 8 December, 2021

Author: M.Duraiswamy

Bench: M.Duraiswamy, J.Sathya Narayana Prasad

                                                                          W.A.No.2150 of 2012

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 08.12.2021

                                                     CORAM

                              THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
                                                and
                         THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

                                            Writ Appeal No.2150 of 2012
                                               and M.P.No.1 of 2012

                     1.S.Saravanan
                     2.P.Balasubramanian
                     3.V.Pandian
                     4.K.Chandrasekaran
                     5.R.Rangarajan
                     6.R.Ambikapathy
                     7.V.Selvamoorthy
                     8.V.Sugumaran
                     9.K.Rajaram
                     10.M.Kader Meera Sahib
                     11.P.Madasamy
                     12.G.Manoharan
                     13.R.Isaac Paulraj Boopathy
                     14.P.Jayaraj
                     15.K.Krishnamoorthy
                     16.R.Chandran
                     17.K.Narayanamoorthy
                     18.A.Bhathavachalam
                     19.K.Periasamy
                     20.S.Elambaruthi
                     21.K.Jagannathan
                     22.K.Kamaraj
                     23.K.M.Natrajan

                     _________
                     Page 1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                   W.A.No.2150 of 2012

                     24.D.Shanmugam
                     25.K.Sunderraraj
                     26.K.Kumarasamy
                     27.J.Duraisamy
                     28.T.Mariappan
                     29.P.Ramalingam
                     30.N.Nachimuthu
                     31.P.Muthuraj
                     32.R.Subramanian
                     33.S.Navaneethakrishnan
                     34.P.Gunasekaran
                     35.P.Nagarajan
                     36.K.Nachiappan
                     37.A.Periasamy
                     38.R.Chelladurai
                     39.N.Sampathkumar
                     40.G.Balraj
                     41.R.Selvaraj
                     42.C.Sambasivam                            .. Appellants

                                                         -vs-

                     1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by
                       The Secretary to Government,
                       Home Department, Fort St.George,
                       Chennai – 9.

                     2.The Director General of Police,
                       Kamarajar Salai,
                       Mylapore, Chennai – 4.

                     3.V.R.Soundarajan
                     4.P.Balachandran
                     5.S.M.Mohammed Iqbal
                     6.K.Chndarasekaran
                     7.D.Jude F.A.S.Duraipandian

                     _________
                     Page 2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.A.No.2150 of 2012

                     8.S.Selva Arasu
                     9.G.Sankar Pandian
                     10.K.Rajakumar
                     11.K.Sethuraman
                     12.S.Rajendran
                     13.M.X.B.Stanley
                     14.K.Rajendran
                     15.M.Murugesan
                     16.E.M.Swaminathan
                     17.S.Maran
                     18.S.Eswaran
                     19.D.Muthamizhan
                     20.N.Dhanapal
                     21.K.S.Subramanian
                     22.M.Sundararajan
                     23.R.Ravindran
                     24.M.Alas Ali
                     25.K.N.Murali
                     26.K.Nataraja Murthy
                     27.C.Sivasamy
                     28.M.Jagabar Sali
                     29.R.Hari
                     30.G.S.Sivanathan
                     31.R.Valsarajan                                            .. Respondents

                                  Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated
                     11.09.2012 in W.P.No.21039 of 2010.
                                       For Appellants    :     Mr.Tamil Selvan
                                                               for Mr.K.Muthuramalingam
                                       For Respondents
                                       R1 & R2           :     Mr. R.V.Dinesh Rajkumar
                                                               Additional Government Pleader
                                       R5                :     Mr.Suchindran
                                       R6 & R23          :     No appearance


                     _________
                     Page 3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      W.A.No.2150 of 2012



                                                         JUDGMENT

(Delivered by M.Duraiswamy, J.) Challenging the order passed in W.P.No.21039 of 2010, the writ petitioners have filed the above writ appeal.

2.The petitioners have filed the writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent 1 and 2 to restore the seniority on the basis of ranking given by the Police Training College in respect of the writ petitioners who were directly recruited Sub-Inspector of Police in 1979 batch in view of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.Nos.38792 and 38793 of 2003 dated 10.09.2007.

3.The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition by giving a direction to the Government to pass orders with regard to the seniority of the petitioners as well as the respondents in accordance with law.

4.When the writ appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that all the appellants have already _________ Page 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2150 of 2012 attained the age of superannuation, hence nothing survives for adjudication in this writ appeal.

5.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                      (M.D., J.)      (J.S.N.P., J.)
                                                                              08.12.2021
                     Index: Yes/ No
                     Speaking Order : Yes/ No
                     cse

                     To

1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 4.

_________ Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2150 of 2012 M.DURAISWAMY, J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

cse W.A.No.2150 of 2012 08.12.2021 _________ Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis