Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Chellapandian vs The Commissioner on 26 August, 2022

Author: C.Saravanan

Bench: C.Saravanan

                                                                            W.P.No.21933 of 2022

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                          DATED : 26.08.2022

                                                CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                          W.P.No.21933 of 2022

              M.Chellapandian                                           ... Petitioner

                                                   Vs.

              1.The Commissioner,
                Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment,
                Chennai.

              2.The Deputy Commissioner,
                Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment,
                Coimbatore District.

              3.The Executive Officer,
                Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department,
                Arulmigu Mariamman and Vinayagar Temple,
                Soolukkal, Kinathukadavu,
                Coimbatore - 642 110.

              4.The Sub-Registrar Negamam,
                Office of the Sub-Registrar Negamam,
                Negamam Town, Pollachi Taluk,
                Coimbatore District.                                   ... Respondents

              Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
              praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent
              not to interfere with the petitioner's property by sending frivolous letters by
              claiming ownership of the petitioner property in Survey No.82/2B2 without
              any valid documents to the fourth respondent or any other authorities.

                 ____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
              Page No. 1 of 6
                                                                             W.P.No.21933 of 2022




                                  For Petitioner      : Mr.S.Saravanan

                                  For Respondents :
                                  For R1 to R3    : Mrs.M.Geetha Thamarailsevan
                                                    Special Government Pleader

                                  For R4              : Mrs.C.Meera Arumugam
                                                        Additional Government Pleader


                                                   ORDER

Mrs.M.Geetha Thamaraiselvan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the first to third respondents and Mrs.C.Meera Arumugam, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the fourth respondent.

2. This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to not to interfere with the petitioner's property by sending letters claiming ownership over the property by the third respondent without any valid documents.

3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner has purchased the property from his vendor one P.Natarajan on 15.09.2016 after ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 2 of 6 W.P.No.21933 of 2022 payment of valuable consideration and had registered the same as Doc.No.2432 of 2016 before the Sub-Registrar's Office, Negamam Town, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District, the fourth respondent herein.

4. It is submitted that the petitioner has suffered financial loss and therefore intends to alienate the same. However, when the petitioner along with his prospective buyer went for registration of the Sale Deed, the fourth respondent orally informed that the land belongs to the third respondent.

5. When the case was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader for the first to third respondents submits that Conditional Pattas were granted to the persons in possession under the Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963, and that other records are being traced out and that the petitioner does not have a valid title over the land in view of Section 34 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. The fourth respondent is not obliged to register any Sale Deed under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908.

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 3 of 6 W.P.No.21933 of 2022

6. Considering the same, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition, at the time of admission, by directing the fourth respondent to pass a speaking order on the petitioner's representation dated 01.06.2022, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, so that the petitioner can workout his remedy in accordance with law.

7. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations.

No costs.

26.08.2022 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking Order arb ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 4 of 6 W.P.No.21933 of 2022 To

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Coimbatore District.

3.The Executive Officer, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Arulmigu Mariamman and Vinayagar Temple, Soolukkal, Kinathukadavu, Coimbatore - 642 110.

4.The Sub-Registrar Negamam, Office of the Sub-Registrar Negamam, Negamam Town, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District.

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 5 of 6 W.P.No.21933 of 2022 C.SARAVANAN, J.

arb W.P.No.21933 of 2022 26.08.2022 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 6 of 6